 |
| Modules |  |
| Google |  |
|
These ads help pay for the upkeep of our site. They are automatically served by Google and are not affiliated with This is MS. | |
| Languages |  |
|
Select Interface Language:
| |
| Who''s Online |  |
There are currently, 171 guest(s) and 79 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here | |
| Next Step |  |
| Donations |  |
|
To remain unbiased, This is MS does not accept corporate sponsorships. Therefore, we must rely on our users to help support us. Please donate to our upkeep if you have the means. Thank you! | |
|  |
 | Lessons from Campath: Early Protection of CNS Critical |
Campath-1H is a experimental treatment for MS currently in clinical
trials. While this new report touches upon the promising efficacy of
the treatment, its main focus is on the difference between the
effectiveness of therapeutic intervention at the relapsing-remitting
stage of Multiple Sclerosis versus the secondary progressive stage. The
ultimate conclusion is that early and potent treatment can
significantly improve the patient''''s health, whereas attempting to do
the same when the disease has already progressed lacks impact. In a
very important point, this is even true when the MRI scans show no
further disease progression-- reiterating what we have learned about
secondary progressive MS not being an inflammatory condition, but rather one of neuronal/axonal loss and/or degradation.
Now this study does not mean that people who are secondary progressive
are beyond therapeutic hope-- what it implies is that secondary
progressive patients will not benefit from this specific type of
treatment targeting the reduction of inflammatory cells (e.g., likewise
with Tysabri), presumably because the disease is no longer an
inflammatory condition by that point. This is a positive finding, as it
helps narrow the scope of treatment rather than blindly trying various
poweful therapies in the hopes one will work. As bystanders to the
research, it becomes quite clear that treating MS effectively will
require tailored therapies-- if not to the individual then to the
individual''''s disease stage. While we already see this in the current
therapies, reinforcement breeds familiarity.
"From
1991-2002, we treated 58 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using the
humanised monoclonal antibody, Campath- 1H, which causes prolonged T lymphocyte
depletion. Clinical and surrogate markers of inflammation were suppressed. In
both the relapsing- remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) stages of the
illness, Campath-1H reduced the annual relapse rate (from 2.2 to 0.19 and from
0.7 to 0.001 respectively; both p < 0.001). Remarkably, MRI scans of patients
with SP disease, treated with Campath-1H 7 years previously, showed no new
lesion formation. However, despite these effects on inflammation, disability was
differently affected depending on the phase of the disease."
Click "read more" for the full abstract...
Full Abstract
The window of therapeutic opportunity in
multiple sclerosis: Evidence from monoclonal antibody
therapy.
Coles
AJ, Cox
A, Le
Page E, Jones
J, Trip
SA, Deans
J, Seaman
S, Miller
DH, Hale
G, Waldmann
H, Compston
DA.
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Box 165, Addenbrooke''''s
Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK, ajc1020@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
From
1991-2002, we treated 58 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using the
humanised monoclonal antibody, Campath- 1H, which causes prolonged T lymphocyte
depletion. Clinical and surrogate markers of inflammation were suppressed. In
both the relapsing- remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) stages of the
illness, Campath-1H reduced the annual relapse rate (from 2.2 to 0.19 and from
0.7 to 0.001 respectively; both p < 0.001). Remarkably, MRI scans of patients
with SP disease, treated with Campath-1H 7 years previously, showed no new
lesion formation. However, despite these effects on inflammation, disability was
differently affected depending on the phase of the disease. Patients with SPMS
showed sustained ac*****ulation of disability due to uncontrolled progression
marked by unrelenting cerebral atrophy, attributable to ongoing axonal loss. The
rate of cerebral atrophy was greatest in patients with established cerebral
atrophy and highest inflammatory lesion burden before treatment (2.3 versus 0.7
ml/year; p = 0.04). In contrast, patients with RR disease showed an impressive
reduction in disability at 6 months after Campath-1H (by a mean of 1.2 EDSS
points) perhaps owing to a suppression of on-going inflammation in these
patients with unusually active disease. In addition, there was a further
significant, albeit smaller, mean improvement in disability up to 36 months
after treatment.We speculate that this represents the beneficial effects of
early rescue of neurons and axons from a toxic inflammatory environment, and
that prevention of demyelination will prevent long-term axonal degeneration.
These concepts are currently being tested in a controlled trial comparing
Campath-1H and IFN-beta in the treatment of drug-naive patients with early,
active RR MS.
PMID: 16044212 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Copyrights to respective holders.
|
|
|
|
| |
| Login |  |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. | |
| Related Links |  |
| Article Rating |  |
Average Score: 4.5 Votes: 4

| |
| Options |  |
|
Re: Lessons from Campath: Early Protection of CNS Critical (Score: 1) by mlesueur on Saturday, July 30 @ 08:35:24 CDT (User Info | Send a Message) | A little too technical for me but nice to know nonetheless.
|
|
|
Re: Lessons from Campath: Early Protection of CNS Critical (Score: 1) by bromley on Saturday, July 30 @ 08:53:22 CDT (User Info | Send a Message) | To some extent this is old news - previous presentations / papers by Dr Coles have stated that Campath was good at stopping attacks but for those with SP brain atrophy continued. There is no information here on whether treatment with Campath for those with RR stopped them moving to SP. The Campath thread on this site has reports by two who have received this treatment - LabRat and Raven.
The greatest contribution of this work is the recognition that inflammation is only half the story and that in order to prevent disability, protecting the axons / neurones is critical. Stopping inflamation is not enough. It also puts a big questionmark over the CRAB treatments given their poor efficacy in stppoing relapses / inflammation. There is also still a large question about PP MS where inflammation play a very small role yet disability caused by the death of axons / neurones continues. Something else is at work in addition to inflammation - if they could crack that then real progress would be seen. |
|
|
| 
|