cah wrote:sbr487, though I don't know of course, I'd say:
Note that it's "about" the CCSVI theory, not "to". My provocative question about the CCSVI theory would be: "Why has it been declined so long?"
If this doesn't convince you, think about that: They now have announced that they will offer diagnosis in mid february along with announcing to publish first results in february. Would they just begin to commercially offer diagnosing (and trying to get it covered by insurance) while having to say that it's all nonsense or useless? Wouldn't make any sense. On the contrary, it even wouldn't make much sense to offer diagnosis if they didn't knew that treatment is at least possible...
Today is a milestone!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users