This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 1:15 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:43 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 33
i GOT this disturbing message sent to me, and i saw that this same 'cardiologist' in Canada is spamming the same message to all MS sufferers he finds on Twitter. He is obviously meticulously going through the Twitter CCSVI support group and sending the below link with the warning that CCSVI is "JUNK SCIENCE"

It has infuriated me, what do you all think?

http://medicalmyths.wordpress.com/2009/ ... i-surreal/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:47 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 1419
Location: California
He is in idiot! I totally understand he has his beliefs but to try and prevent science investigating a new theory with regards to an incurable disease is daft!! Why rule something out before it has been scientifically ruled out???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:52 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 33
hE IS comparing Zamboni to past century magicians and hypnotherapists?

i blocked him on my twitter page as a knee-jerk reaction - hope everyone else he has spammed does the same. He is on a mission - very disturbing and when i looked at his 'status' before i blocked him, it said 'keeping people out of hospitals' - what a JOKE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:11 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 336
Location: Germany
This thing is old, already discussed on TIMS for example here and here. He says that there's no such thing as CCSVI as it is anatomically impossible (your eyes would pop out...). Bufallo and the CCSVI approval of the UIP already have proven him wrong.

_________________
"There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance." Socrates


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:43 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 860
Location: India
Some comments make interesting read ...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/73416633@N00/4314787610/

He has been logically questioned by lay readers.

Obviously, he is thick skinned. Otherwise he would take a couple of minutes and looked within ...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:42 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 1155
Location: Riverside, CA
Reminds me of a kid throwing a hissy fit in the middle of a store. More you tell him to stop, worse it gets. I think it's sad that someone can become so jaded, they're more known for what they are anti, than what they stand for.

_________________
RRMS Dx'd 2007, first episode 2004. Bilateral stent placement, 3 on left, 1 stent on right, at Stanford August 2009. Watch my operation video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwc6QlLVtko, Virtually symptom free since, no relap


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:55 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 946
Location: The United Kingdom
sbr487 wrote:
Some comments make interesting read ...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/73416633@N00/4314787610/

He has been logically questioned by lay readers.

Obviously, he is thick skinned. Otherwise he would take a couple of minutes and looked within ...


They make for a good read, you're right. A good antidote to the first link in this thread. They get a bit too aggressive though, no?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:13 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 228
Location: Argentina
Nice answers by Chris Sullivan

In fact Colin didn't respond.

Quote:
Colin Rose said

February 15, 2010 at 13:01
From the look of your facebook portrait I would highly doubt you have severe enough narrowings in both jugulars to cause any disease. If you did, your face would look like someone who has been stranged, blue and swollen with protruding tongue and eyeballs.

What type of Doppler did you have? Having a friend, knowing your diagnosis, do a test on you, the interpretation of which is highly subjective, is not advised. If he had said you had normal veins would he still be your friend?

Before any surgery is done it is imperative to measure pressure gradients across the presumed blockage seen on a venogram. If upstream pressure is not high and there is no significant gradient, stenting would be useless as well as dangerous. Stenting of arteries is an entirely different procedure, irrelevant to any presumed venous pathology.



Quote:
Chrisoneeye said

February 15, 2010 at 19:01
You admit they can cause disease?
Looks can deceive. Not working, walking, driving, riding bike, or playing guitar anymore. Fall way too often, especially when head not upright. Use wheelchair or non-mobile chair in house mostly.
Already addressed face. Think that’s how I started. Many ways to avoid purple+death. Onset is gradual, if you are not born with it. Being strangled veryslowly.
Doppler brand? Famous Japanese name. Need protocol, make, model? Very recent purchase. 5 MHz probe I think, but not positive.
Surgeon will take measurements he/she needs.

-Chris Sullivan


Quote:
Chrisoneeye said

February 16, 2010 at 11:09
I hope anyone still reading this realizes that my last post (4., above) was in answer to Colin’s (5.above).

I can’t argue any more. I hope they have their minds made up. I do.

Thanks.

Chris Sullivan


http://medicalmyths.wordpress.com/2010/ ... -on-ccsvi/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:48 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 1161
Wow I just went off on him


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:48 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 115
It doesn't infuriate me. I am not convinced either way about CCSVI. It seems like a chicken or egg deal. Same thing about iron deposits. I don't know if he should go that far in his attacks. It does seem personal. Still, CCSVI doesn't look like a very good choice for most people. The same infuriation can be applied to all the hype in regard to CCSVI as being the cure all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 5:51 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 167
This is about the only thing I can agree upon with this person:

"multiple sclerosis, one of the more miserable of chronic, incurable diseases"

What a jerk!

_________________
Boyfriend dx'd 6-6-06!!! RRMS............CCSVI procedure done on Nov. 13, 2010 and March 7, 2011 by Dr. Sclafani!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 5:55 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 445
Location: colorado
Apparently McGill must have stopped teaching the virtues of scientific rigor and instead began focusing on spamming. If more people thought like CRose, the sun would still be rotating around the earth.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:05 am 
Online
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 523
cah wrote:
This thing is old, already discussed on TIMS for example here and here. He says that there's no such thing as CCSVI as it is anatomically impossible (your eyes would pop out...). Bufallo and the CCSVI approval of the UIP already have proven him wrong.


That's fun. These people says that CCSVI is anatomically impossible, and at the same time, that it is produced by MS (instead of the other way around)

Anyway is not so bad. In other times we would be accused of heresy by our statements.

_________________
You can get a worldwide list of available sites for CCSVI at http://www.ccsviclinic.info


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:26 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 209
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Weird behavior. I have seen him post stuff from all around the net. Certainly entitled to his opinion but to tweet people directly seems to cross the line. I don't think the leadership at McGill would be impressed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: definition of spamming
PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:32 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 35
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
E-mail spam, also known as junk e-mail, is a subset of spam that involves nearly identical messages sent to numerous recipients by e-mail. A common synonym for spam is unsolicited bulk e-mail (UBE). Definitions of spam usually include the aspects that email is unsolicited and sent in bulk. ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(e-mail)

Replying to individual twitters to discuss the topic of the twitters is not spamming. Why would anyone twitter and not want to discuss the topic of the twitter?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Severe headaches after CCSVI and occluded stent

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

ozarkcanoer

16

2377

Mon May 02, 2011 11:11 am

1eye View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Simka paper: CCSVI treatment improves severe fatigue

Cece

2

447

Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:10 pm

CuriousRobot View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CCSVI Intro for your doctor

Miss_Feisty

2

1171

Thu Nov 26, 2009 8:00 pm

Miss_Feisty View the latest post

This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. A doctor's questions re: CCSVI

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1 ... 4, 5, 6 ]

jay123

87

10599

Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:52 am

patientx View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Convinced my Doctor on CCSVI but unsure what is next

SouthsideJohnny

6

1295

Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:47 pm

jay123 View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: