This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 3:09 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:57 am 
Online
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 293
After reading lots on CCSVI and the liberation procedure it looks like having Stents or Balloons is catch 22:

You have Stents: Risk of stent migration = heart failure/attack

You have balloons: Risk of restenosis = travelling back to Poland for them to put stents in instead!


So im quite confused what to request when i have my procedure.

It seems like Catch22, you pick the mpost efficient way (stents) and there is a huge risk, or you pick the safer but less sustainable choice (balloons)

What does everyone else think about this?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:24 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 449
I'm not sure doctors are offering patients the choice. I believe doctors are going with their own medical opinion on what is the best option to try given what they find. Doctors appear hesitant to try stents at first instance unless they are reasonably certain that angioplasty will most likely not be successful. I don't know if the patients are given the choice to decide what they want themselves, doctors are making the decision based on their experience and expertise in this area.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:29 am 
Online
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 293
eric593 wrote:
I'm not sure doctors are offering patients the choice. I believe doctors are going with their own medical opinion on what is the best option to try given what they find. Doctors appear hesitant to try stents at first instance unless they are reasonably certain that angioplasty will most likely not be successful. I don't know if the patients are given the choice to decide what they want themselves, doctors are making the decision based on their experience and expertise in this area.


oh i thought the patient had the option of deciding.
but yeah that does make sense for the surgeon to decide when he has examined the stenosis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:41 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 46
Location: Sweden
Absolutely right Eric. We were four liberated the same day. Everybody had different problems and the doctors (in Poland )now what they are doing. It´s not a guessing game. But if you would not like a stent they not forcing you, and do the balloning instead. But my descision was to do what was needed to be done. One stent in jugular and waiting with stent in azygos (not so much reflux there). Not complicated, but the doctors advice was to wait couple of months and see if I´m satisfied with improvement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:42 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 465
My IR gave several very well thought out reasons for not implanting a stent. First, and most importantly, the location of my stenosis was in a very tight spot: not much space between the skull and the skin. He also mentioned that stents are capable of between 40,000 and 50,000 flex's before they might break into pieces, and that area involves a lot of motion. Lastly, if the stent had to be removed, it might involve surgery. Now that the exact location of my stenosis has been determined, if the veins relapse he will know right where to go.

Donnchadh


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:02 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8505
Donnchadh wrote:
He also mentioned that stents are capable of between 40,000 and 50,000 flex's before they might break into pieces, and that area involves a lot of motion.


This is good information. They'll come up with the a better sort of stent, it just isn't out there yet...and I hope my issues can be fixed with ballooning alone, I want this to be over!!

_________________
"However, the truth in science ultimately emerges, although sometimes it takes a very long time," Arthur Silverstein, Autoimmunity: A History of the Early Struggle for Recognition


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Are Balloons safer than having stents?

adamt

8

1125

Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:57 pm

Zeureka View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. balloons

Cece

4

632

Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:08 pm

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. cutting balloons?

drbart

5

1394

Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:03 pm

nanobot View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. drug eluting balloons

Cece

0

511

Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:39 pm

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. different types of balloons in angioplasty

Pauline

0

878

Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:06 pm

Pauline View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: