This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 7:33 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:57 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 90
Location: Michigan
Many medical folks have been stopped from pursuing CCSVI testing and treatment pending IRB approvals.

With neuro resistance to CCSVI theory, what are the chances ANY irb's will be approved? Have any been approved yet?

Why wouldn't IRB boards just tell everyone to wait until more formal blind studies are completed before treating/testing CCSVI?

I'll take my aluminum foil hat off now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: .
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:26 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
.


Last edited by Lyon on Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:27 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 249
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
IRB does not serve to dictate treatment or not.

It's purpose is to protect patients during RESEARCH. If the doctor isn't doing research ... then you don't even need an IRB approval.

At this point though, they all want to do research to spread this (can't blame them).

But if you find a doctor willing, he doesn't have to go through an IRB first to treat you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:39 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:00 pm
Posts: 1068
Why are careful reviews by an IRB necessary? One example:

http://jme.bmj.com/content/28/1/3.full.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 1:15 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
.


Last edited by Lyon on Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 1:34 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 1310
Location: Rotorua New Zealand
Dr Freedman may have some input on this regarding his experiences with the death in his trail (on stem cells) where a patient died with <20 participants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:33 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
.


Last edited by Lyon on Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:50 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 249
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
COMPLETELY off topic ... but I read this and couldn't believe it.

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's IRB approved a "face transplant" treatment.

I'd say that's a lot more risky (or at least experimental) than CCSVI procedure ... considering only 2 have been done in the US ever.

I find this odd ... but I'm not quite sure I can articulate why ...


http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10159/1064080-100.stm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:24 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 860
Location: India
As more and more people end up going abroad and have the treatment. As more and more people come back with "anecdotal" +ve outcome, it will become compelling for IRB to approve (with whatever safety protocols necessary).

They are definitely walking a thin line in this case. If CCSVI turns out to be a success, they will have a lot of explaining to do if they turn down proposals now.

Reminds me of stem cell treatment status when Bush was at helm. Lot of top notch researchers resented that they cannot carry out this research in US while its done in Korea etc. Some of them even contemplated moving to these foreign universities then. The govt later approved. Bush later said that people will wonder what this issue was all about when they look back at this years later.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Hold your breath!

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

eve

38

5104

Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:20 am

eve View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Do something now or better to just hold off?

Johnnymac

2

922

Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:14 pm

selkie View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. On Hold w/ Houston

Artifishual

5

1163

Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:16 pm

Artifishual View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. the liberation on hold ...

MAREK

5

1683

Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:31 am

Rici View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Buffalo CCSVI testing "On Hold"

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

Wichita

17

4936

Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:34 pm

Rosegirl View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: