This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:02 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:32 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 185
NO SHIT... get on with it already...... We're suffering here...


LINK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:52 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 185
Quote:
“We are proceeding very cautiously and slowly with this. It might work or it might be a dead end, but we need to see where the science takes us without risking patient safety,”


This has all been said here before... over and over again... BUT

Let the patient decide if they want to take the risk...

Funny how we can take drugs with risk and its ok, but not THIS...

WHY?

Zamboni has been studying ccsvi for years... Did it take a news story (CTV - nov 2009) to shed light on this possible breakthru and folks are just now getting around to looking at it???

I NEED treated now...

SRY for the anger... I'm just hurting and need to vent... :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 7:22 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 178
Location: Ontario, Canada
In their testing only 20 out of 40 MS patients had CCSVI....that isn't real promising....is their testing a lot different than Zamboni's?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 7:30 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8556
In the 'My son's liberation' thread, Jackie posted that her son had a test done elsewhere that had shown severe blockage and then the test at Georgetown showed only minor issues...she speculated that if it weren't for the other location's test he might not have been selected for the Georgetown 20...but he was and they found and fixed some very severe CCSVI issues...so I think once again we have difficulties in the imaging and back to the idea that venogram is the gold standard.

_________________
"However, the truth in science ultimately emerges, although sometimes it takes a very long time," Arthur Silverstein, Autoimmunity: A History of the Early Struggle for Recognition


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 6:22 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 691
so they imaged 40 people and only found ccsvi in 20. Really someone should be in charge of challenging the other 20. Feorgetown is operating under a 50% is right assumption that should be challenged. In a way, the 20 negatives are the interesting imaging problems that have come out of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 50%
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 7:22 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 31
It seems like they should do a venogram on the negatives (if they want it) to see if it might be a imaging problem....... That would let them know if doppler and the other imaging tests are reliable....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 8:44 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 27
From personal experience I agree with Flashover81's comment. When I was in Poland a couple of weeks ago, Dr Simka did a Doppler on me and said that there was no problem with my left jugular and only a very small problem with the right jugular but that they would look again under a venogram. After the procedure another doctor (not sure of his name) showed my husband what they had done - angioplasty on both veins - it seems that the right was 50% blocked and the left had a problem with the valve...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Does tinnitus improve following CCSVI treatment?

David1949

5

964

Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:51 pm

jamieron82 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CTV: Study suggests controversial MS treatment gets results

ThisIsMA

2

985

Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:37 pm

thornyrose76 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Those who had L.treatment, how much did you mobility improve

adamt

3

1103

Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:11 am

gibbledygook View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Fund Raising for CCSVI Treatment Research

Direct-MS

2

860

Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:55 pm

Direct-MS View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Small study suggests CCSVI may not be involved in MS

squiffy2

7

1618

Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:27 am

1eye View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
Read hundreds of personal Multiple Sclerosis stories on Experience Project. Experience Project is an anonymous community where people connect through their life experiences, made by the same people who built This is MS. With over 30 million personal stories about every possible life experience, you can quickly find people like you!


Interesting: Secret Confessions | Dream Meanings | Ask Questions, Get Answers

Advertise on the premier multiple sclerosis forum