BNAC is the only site in the world who is performing blinded studies of CCSVI. It will be their results that will convince the academics
that's why it's so awful that they are doing substandard work. It really speaks to me of 'the guy with the most expensive machine must be right' and in truth they have dealt a large blow to the credibility of the entire project by arrogantly doing it wrong and saying it's right.
Even I having rrms and heading to poland am unsure if the 'missing 40%' from buffalo is because all the membranes and valve issues others find are just missed by buffalo or because they are not there. The reason I think they are there and buffalo just can't see them has more to do with believing in Putnam than anything else.
Clearly buffalo is out to prove the other model where neurology still reigns supreme, ms causes ccsvi, and using mrv is not only smart, it's better!