BooBear wrote:What would make it really sweet would be proof that the pharmas overstated the efficacy of the drugs.
Personally I want to know how this ONE study shows one thing when a ton of others show the opposite.
mmcc wrote:Personally I want to know how this ONE study shows one thing when a ton of others show the opposite.
LR1234 wrote:Maybe or their own DMD's don't do much but once they are coupled with fixing the CCSVI issues (they were tested on purely immune system issues as in the EAE model) maybe they will be more efficient????
Professor Alastair Compston, Head of the Department of Clinical Neurosciences at the University of Cambridge and winner of the 2007 Charcot Award for a lifetime achievement in MS research, is one of the MS Society's six medical advisors.
He said: "The treatment for CCSVI is not available for patients with multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom because there is no convincing evidence to suggest that it is safe or beneficial to people with MS.
"People with MS are unlikely to benefit from treatments that dilate blood vessels."
Do you seriously think that we have to be quiet like a beaten child....in front of this historical scandal?
Without any fear....
i repeatit for you...
As a very peacefull canadian, someone who trusted the medical system enought to shoot herself for eight years with a medication that worth nothing but destroyed my life......
LAW SUIT LAW SUIT LAW SUIT LAW SUIT LAW SUIT LAW SUIT LAW SUIT LAW SUIT!
Barbara from Canada the contry where we usually dont sue anybody!
exept when it is the time!
AND NOW IT IS THE TIME
Users browsing this forum: 10yearsandstillkicken