This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 4:41 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:10 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2564
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
It was recently proved (today, in fact), treament for CCSVI can save lives. That is significant. It is now speculated that it, and May-Thurner, are both part of a systemic condition. I still think it is congenital. Anyway, veins have been blamed a long time. I predict that it will soon be the dominant theory. They're all just theories, until they make a difference in your life. Then they are facts.

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:06 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 521
Trish317 wrote:
Cece wrote:
Fat-induced vascular problems is a previous theory.

Congenital truncular vascular malfomations is the current theory of ccsvi.

It seemed important to keep that clear.


I think it's also important to remember that, until recently, the technology did not exist to identify or treat the vascular malformations.


Not exactly. The current definition for CCSVI is venous reflux into the brain, regardless of what produces the reflux. Therefore the first proposer was Dr. Schelling in Austria in the 80's.

In most of the people the problem is due to vascular malformations, but it cannot be said that it happens in all of the cases.

_________________
You can get a worldwide list of available sites for CCSVI at http://www.ccsviclinic.info


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:43 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 782
Location: XinDian, Taiwan
Cerebro-Spinal (brain and spinal cord)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:14 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 759
Location: Paignton, Devon, UK
1eye wrote:
They're all just theories, until they make a difference in your life. Then they are facts.


What a great quote. May I use it? :D

Thes few words say more about research and data than anything I have ever read in the literature. What point is there to any theory unless it is tested and re tested and the results are proven and repeatable?

_________________
Find us on Facebook.com/InclinedBedTherapy
IBT website: http://inclinedbedtherapy.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:20 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 690
Quote:
As an overall scheme for CCSVI, I think this theory is much more reasonable than congenital CCSVI.

But I'm not sure where some of the malformations found when doing Liberation procedure would fit into the fat-induced theory--I see them as not congenital, but environmental--that is, dietary deficiencies as underlying cause.


I wonder how cut and dry that is? Vascular experts fom 40 countries meet and declare ccsvi truncular... is there margin for error? Was this a subjective call or something really solid like the bones in your body? Ive seen the truncular idea challenged a lot mostly by docs who are experienced with ms and are used to NOTHING being solid. What if the certainty is 99%?

dunno could be 50%


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. autoimmune theory

sbr487

1

811

Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:05 am

patticake66 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Is this CCSVI/PAD/AI theory possible?

miri

4

306

Fri May 10, 2013 2:19 pm

1eye View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Iron in Zamboni's theory

Ernst

6

1706

Sun Nov 29, 2009 10:17 am

AndrewKFletcher View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. No Conspiracy Theory Comes Close

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

reg613

17

2826

Sun Dec 20, 2009 3:22 am

Johnson View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. My theory about bleeding after the procedure

mags4short

8

1125

Thu May 13, 2010 1:10 pm

moochsid View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: adamt


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: