I am shocked.
Just what is a troublemaker?? I am getting the sense its definition here is anyone who disagress with the general trend of a thread--on this one in particular, it seems to be if you disagree with the urgency of CCSVI--even if you might be open to it, but want more proof--and god forbid, you question Dr Sclafani (he himself I think is much wiser, and would be MUCH more open to disagreement, not seeing it as a denial of himself.)
So, you are looking for a closed-in world? No questions, no sharing of opinions, just blanket approval of the consensus?
CCSVI itself would have already hit the dust if it had not been willing to buck the consensus.
concerned wrote:Okay I sent the private messages. What more can we do now to help get rid of them?[/u]
concerned wrote:I was joking.
Does this thread really contribute anything new? Jimmylegs has posted those rules before and they're in a sticky. I think it [this thread] should be locked.
With sincerest apologies to the readers of the thread, I have removed my post.
I just signed on...
I sincerely apologize for causing you more work. I also sincerely apologize for promoting the book.
and if I might be permitted...
I apologize. Have no worries of any kind. My proper apology to you, and everyone else, will be forthcoming.
Thanks for your kind reply.
For the sake of TIMS, I'm leaving TIMS so no one needs to worry about anything, ever.
Best wishes all.
Your words kept coming back to me, pulling me back into the TIMS family. If I may say... You are an excellent Moderator. Thank you very, very much.
I would also like to thank my friend Johnson (and one or two other special people) for encouraging me to come back to TIMS. In the future, I will keep in mind using the EDIT button.
Feeling like a part of this phenomenal family is so wonderful -- I promise everyone that I will always try my best to be worthy of the honor and the privilege of being an active member of TIMS.
Edit: in answer to jimmyleg's question, "I Wish!"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users