Billmeik wrote:What I find the most interesting of all ....... were those pwMS that upon examination for re-stenosising [sp ] < 4 those watching for correct grammar .............. when Dr. Zamboni repeated his Liberation treatment ..... once again ..... the pwMS regained some improvements .
Some in hours .... others in day's ...... remarkable .... amazing ..........
ya but we need to trap for causative order. What if the ms attack happened first causing restenosis? This could be ruled out if someone got a dated image showing restenosis and then had some kind of proof when the ms attack happened...hmmm.
the consortium uni0n of phlebology consensus document with its statement that CCSVI is a congenital truncal vascular malformation
What is a congenital vascular malformation?
A: Congenital vascular malformation,often referred to as "CVM" among clinicians, is an inborn defect resulting from the arrest of normal development of the vascular structure, and/or failure of orderly resorption of the embryologic primitive vascular element and subsequent persistence of the immature anomalous vascular structure. In other words, when this primitive vascular structure, which is essential for the rapid development of embryonal life, should fail to continue to develop normally and/ or remains even after birth following failure of the normal resorption of this embryonal vascular structure (which is no longer needed after birth), this anomalous vascular structure/embryonal remnant jeopardizes normal life after birth. Therefore, depending upon the stage of the embryologic morphogenesis at which the arrays stop, various types of vascular malformation can occur. Hence, "vascular malformation" seems to be enough to define this inborn abnormality without further addition of "congenital," because all vascular malformations are the result of an inborn error, after all.
So far, we've seen cysts, double jugulars, bony and tissue obstructions, faulty valves, and now an absence of presacral venous plexus. And what do all these people have in common? They all have a variety of venous malformations and have MS. MS didn't give Lew a double jugular with an extra valve. MS didn't give my Jeff a tight, muscular neck and I don't think MS made your husband's presacral venous plexus disappear, or his jugulars collapse. I think you have a smart doctor, why...checking the veins that far south. I still want my hubby's legs scanned.
patientx wrote:PCakes wrote:..please cite an example of 'bullying' someone who had a negative treatment experience? Is offering up support by means of suggesting why the treatment failed bullying? Granted, sometimes we should just 'listen' but it's the nature of this beast to try to help.
Sorry, I've never witnessed such a response on any of these sites? Other forms of attack, yes, but this? I hope you can not prove me wrong.
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopic-9176-day ... asc-0.html
(You only have to read through the first 2 or 3 pages.)
An example:My bet is the damn loose stent that the one guy had and his complaints that Dake didn't tell him he was even getting it. I'm not a gambling girl but I would bet on this one.
And this type of stuff is probably only the tip of the iceberg. Sometimes the really bad stuff isn't posted out in the forums.
Users browsing this forum: Robnl