This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 8:14 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:31 pm 
Offline
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 5
Hi all,

I was dx'd with MS in 1999. I just had an MRI with no active lesions. Yet my ability to walk continues to diminish [weak knees, lots of pain in calves, thighs].

So I have to ask 'if no new lesions, why is it harder to walk]???

I have looked at Mays Thurner and Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency. The second condition seems to have alot of my symptoms [i.e. balance, walking, sleepiness, nausea, double or low vision.

Can anyone shed light?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:40 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 4:00 pm
Posts: 554
Lesion load and disability very often do not go hand-in-hand.

Once the disease becomes progressive, lesion loads tend to stabilize, but disability progression continues.

There's more going on to the disease process than just the formation of lesions. There is gray matter atrophy and axonal and neuronal damage and death being done at a level not detectable by MRI.

What you are describing is unfortunately actually pretty typical for patients with MS…

_________________
Marc
www.wheelchairkamikaze.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:06 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 314
Location: grande prairie , alberta,canada
My symptoms got WAY worse from my diagnosis in May 08 until now. I had an MRI done in March 2010 by the same clinic in my home town of Grande Prairie Alberta, Canada that did my first MRI in spring of 08 that led to my diagnosis. The 2 MRIs revealed no apparent change in the one large lesion in my c-spine. I just got back from the Jacobs Neurological Centre at BNAC in Buffalo. It was there that Dr. Hojnacki (v smart neuro IMO ) showed me I had a dozen or so spinal lesions and several discreet lesions within the one large one. He was critical of my previous MRI testing as he was able to find several lesions that the other MRI showed as one large one. His MRI took about twice the time that my previous ones took.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:09 pm 
Offline
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 5
Wow marcstk!

Lesion load and disablity have never been explained to me before.

Unfortunately 'disability progression' is not part of my fantasy.

Thanks for the lesson.

TYA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:37 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 54
Lesion load and disability is a well known disconnect I am surprised your neuro did not explain this (time for a new neuro perhaps). I have had ms for 20 years and have no new lesions and plenty of accumulated disability. Because of the disconnect I never bothered with new MRIs except recently to get insuance to pay I had to have one with my MRV no new lesions.

BZW the drugdcompanies must love this disconnect because they base their studies for the most part on lesion load, it helps them keep people on drugs that may provide no benefits whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:45 pm 
Offline
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 5
jamit,

I don't know about lesion load, probably because I have spent very little time in front of a neuro since my dx in 1999. Mostly because I refused drug therapy from the get go.

I would like to know if any one has seen a reduction in lesions? Or is it even possible?

Thanks! TYA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:22 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2562
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
I figure one thing that will come out in the wash after Liberation is universal, is that they stop if you stop the reflux and free up the veins.

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 6:29 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 144
Hey 10years,
Did u do an MRI of the spine as well as brain ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:15 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 465
And don't forget that according to Dr. Zamboni's CCSVI theory, each day you are accumulating free iron deposition, which is the real culprit causing the cascade of neurological symptoms.

The number, size, and placement of lesions is the result of venous disorders.

Donnchadh

_________________
Kitty says, "Take that, you stenosis!"

Got MS?.....Get Liberated!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:44 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8505
Donnchadh wrote:
The number, size, and placement of lesions is the result of venous disorders.

Yes...one big thing missing from autoimmune theory is an explanation of why lesions form where they do. There are people who never have spinal lesions, only the brain...others have no brain lesions, only spine...no real explanation for that in the autoimmune theory. Also they can clinically classify RR, PP, and SP, but offer no explanation for why.

CCSVI has a plausible and testable answer for these 'unanswerables'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:10 am 
Offline
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 5
vivianne - no MRI of spine, just head and neck - yet they say 'no spinal stenosis' - go figure!

TYA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 6:33 pm 
I think I've read that 90% of lesions are 'silent', that is without symptoms. I've also read that in autopsies, up to 5% of people have lesions, much higher than MS rates.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:37 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 118
Location: O Saviñao, Lugo, Galicia.
Hi,
Your second paragraph may be true, but their research was also concerning relapse rate.
My progression has been very slow, but each relapse has hit me hard, like a sandbag to the back of the head - sudden too.
One minute I'm fine, the next I can't move.
So in my case, I feel that the reduction in relapse rate has been the most important benefit.

In ten years, I've had 4 relapses whilst taking Rebif, one whilst I wasn't on Rebif as I'd moved countries.
I had my first MRI since 01 and I had 5 lesions more than the last MRI.

Day to day - life is pretty normal. Yes, I have the usual delightful MS symptoms that most people with RRMS get, neuropathic pain, spasms, sudden fatigue, but these are just part of life. I'm middle aged, nothing works as well as it did 20 years ago.

I had no more MRIs because I was living in the UK. Unless you are in a trial, doctors consider yearly MRIs to be a waste of their budgets.

After last year's sudden and very nasty relapse my new Spanish neuro, applied for funding for me to restart Rebif. This was granted and hopefully, without excess stress or injury, it will be several years before I have another and even more hopefully, testing and Liberation will be commonplace by then.
Until then, I sticking to my Rebif/LDN/diet/Vitamin D3 regime and I'm going to keep dropping hints to my neuro about CCSVI.



jamit wrote:
Lesion load and disability is a well known disconnect I am surprised your neuro did not explain this (time for a new neuro perhaps). I have had ms for 20 years and have no new lesions and plenty of accumulated disability. Because of the disconnect I never bothered with new MRIs except recently to get insuance to pay I had to have one with my MRV no new lesions.

BZW the drugdcompanies must love this disconnect because they base their studies for the most part on lesion load, it helps them keep people on drugs that may provide no benefits whatsoever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:49 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2562
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
Cece wrote:
Donnchadh wrote:
The number, size, and placement of lesions is the result of venous disorders.

Yes...one big thing missing from autoimmune theory is an explanation of why lesions form where they do. There are people who never have spinal lesions, only the brain...others have no brain lesions, only spine...no real explanation for that in the autoimmune theory. Also they can clinically classify RR, PP, and SP, but offer no explanation for why.

CCSVI has a plausible and testable answer for these 'unanswerables'.


I feel that autoimmune hypothesis is missing an explanation for even the existence of the lesion when compared to the CCSVI hypothesis. Sure, you could try to explain a lot of stuff. Well, the immune cells cause them because they go around in the blood, and veins vs arteries -- well don't they swim upstream, so the direction of the most bad guys... aack. But why try, when explanations given CCSVI hypothesis just jump out at you? It's a higher-quality hypothesis.

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 11:14 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2562
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
jgkarob wrote:
Hi,
Your second paragraph may be true, but their research was also concerning relapse rate.
My progression has been very slow, but each relapse has hit me hard, like a sandbag to the back of the head - sudden too.
One minute I'm fine, the next I can't move.
So in my case, I feel that the reduction in relapse rate has been the most important benefit.

In ten years, I've had 4 relapses whilst taking Rebif, one whilst I wasn't on Rebif as I'd moved countries.
I had my first MRI since 01 and I had 5 lesions more than the last MRI.

Day to day - life is pretty normal. Yes, I have the usual delightful MS symptoms that most people with RRMS get, neuropathic pain, spasms, sudden fatigue, but these are just part of life. I'm middle aged, nothing works as well as it did 20 years ago.

I had no more MRIs because I was living in the UK. Unless you are in a trial, doctors consider yearly MRIs to be a waste of their budgets.

After last year's sudden and very nasty relapse my new Spanish neuro, applied for funding for me to restart Rebif. This was granted and hopefully, without excess stress or injury, it will be several years before I have another and even more hopefully, testing and Liberation will be commonplace by then.
Until then, I sticking to my Rebif/LDN/diet/Vitamin D3 regime and I'm going to keep dropping hints to my neuro about CCSVI.


I hope you never convert to SP'MS'. If Rebif prevents that, whether it has to do with it's effects on immune cells, veins, whatever, great! If it works don't fix it. But if it stops working you may get a little more vocal about that Liberation. Remember, like all treatments for so-called MS, the earlier you do it, the better off you are. Maybe all treatments, period?

I was about to try to reach Dr. Zivadinov about my friend's son's GBS, which is responding very well to blood transfusions. Incidentally, they are using his jugular. Guess it's good he was a star athlete, and that treatment started early. He seems to be mending quickly.

Of course, once you've been hit upside the head once too many times... maybe that's why Zamboni says don't go off your meds. Something might be working for some unknown reason.

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Lesions and SWI

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1 ... 4, 5, 6 ]

cheerleader

77

10539

Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:21 pm

suze View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. No new lesions on last MRI

sofia

2

690

Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:23 pm

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. MS lesions and edema

dignan

3

1253

Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:55 pm

mrhodes40 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. permissive lesions

Cece

10

1696

Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:11 am

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Spinal vs brain lesions?

IHateMS

1

1393

Fri May 22, 2009 9:30 am

cheerleader View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: