concerned wrote:What results from BNAC? Where are they published?
marc wrote:On pages 9 and 10 of the document put out by the CIHR http://mssociety.ca/ccsvi/resources/201 ... tFINAL.pdf
is a list of all of the experts who participated in making the decision to not fund treatment trials. A little googling should easily turn up e-mail addresses and phone numbers for most if not all of these experts. I'm not usually one to advocate open insurrection, but in this particular case I believe that these people should hear from the human beings their decision has impacted, which includes literally every single MS patient in the world, each of whom stand to benefit if CCSVI proves to play a part in the MS puzzle. I urge people to contact these luminaries, and in very polite, rational, but no uncertain terms let them know the misery that comes with waking up each day with MS, and the potentially calamitous effect their decision to delay CCSVI treatment trials has had on them and their loved ones.
Let me be absolutely clear, I am not promoting the harassment of these individuals. Contact with them should under no circumstances be in the form of epithet filled irrational harangues, but rather in personal stories of desperation, disability, and hopelessness. I am calling for advocacy, not agitation.
MrSuccess wrote:The judge , Leona Aglukkaq , listened intently as over 10 so-called expert Bastards ..... each in turn ..... gave testimony against the accused .. Mr. Zamboni .....
sbr487 wrote:concerned wrote:What results from BNAC? Where are they published?
Thats a surprise!!!
If they are not published, why do your favorite neuros and MSS folks keep quoting them?
http://hosted.mediasite.com/mediasite/V ... ebb41a8ba6
I did NOT write
... justify treatment ....
... justify treatment TRIALS...
So, everyone sometimes needs some help.
Users browsing this forum: tzootsi