This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 1:24 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 8:24 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 860
Location: India
Not sure if this was posted already:

http://www.sirweb.org/news/newsPDF/SIR_ ... t_JVIR.pdf

Lot of good observations (and some well deserved snub to existing "stakeholders")

Quote:
Despite the use of current therapies that aim to reduce inflammation, interrupt specific components of the immune system, or prevent neurodegeneration, most patients with MS exhibit a disease course that includes periodic acute relapses that initially resolve but eventually lead to significant clinical deterioration and disability (11–14). Existing MS therapies can also cause disabling side effects that can lead to additional morbidity, precluding the use of such therapies in many patients (14). Therefore, new innovative therapies for MS are urgently required.


Quote:
SIR recognizes that patients with MS constitute a particularly vulnerable
population, whose safety must be protected as new therapeutic
approaches are evaluated.


Quote:
At present, SIR considers the published
literature to be inconclusive on whether CCSVI is a clinically
important factor in the development and/or progression of MS,
and on whether balloon angioplasty and/or stent placement are
clinically effective in patients with MS.

_________________
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it
- Max Planck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 8:41 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8506
Is this the SIR position statement? If it's the same, it came out two weeks ago. I agree, it's great news. It also might encourage some on-the-fence IRs to get in the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 8:42 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: southern California
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopicp-132495-sir.html#132495

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Position Statement: Interventional Endovascular Management..

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

concerned

28

2580

Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:24 am

patientx View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Interventional Neuroradiologists might be your best bet

Crabby

1

1744

Thu Feb 04, 2010 6:14 pm

hwebb View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. interventional radiologist list!

onesickrace

7

1643

Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:41 pm

Ruthless67 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Society of Interventional Radiology!!

PCakes

2

986

Fri Aug 27, 2010 2:16 am

Chrystal View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Interventional radiology brochure

Cece

0

562

Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:55 pm

Cece View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: