I am open about my professional standing, and have been interviewed by London's Daily Telegraph as a CCSVI advocate:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/78823 ... elief.html
Why are you hiding behind the smoke screen of 'Lyon' ????
Lyon wrote: If the pharmas were smart enough to "plant" me at thisisms back in 2006 due to the future threat that CCSVI would pose to their drug sales, you are fighting a battle you could never win.
I never suggested this, why did you introduce it? I was a management consultant in the pharma industry, so if anyone is a pharma plant it is me.
You repeat asking for more info on safety. The safety of balloon venoplasty, which I recommend is proven. It has been used by vascular doctors for many years. So put up or shut up about saying venoplasty is unsafe, it is safe.
Lyon wrote: If the above was any more than your personal opinion there wouldn't be any need for this conversation. Organized medicine would already be convinced of the merit of the theory of CCSVI, which is far from the reality of the situation.
The argument is between different groups of doctors - MS neuros verses vascular doctors. You say organised medicine is against CCSVI. This is pure garbage.
OK Jimmylegs I understand your point. The BNAC group made some mistakes in their control group selection which is being exploited by nay sayers. This must be countered.