His hypothesis is that there is another (unknown) factor that acts together with CCSVI to trigger MS.
He said that the first trigger of MS is NOT CCSVI (1.20min). His hypothesis is that there is another (unknown) factor that acts together with CCSVI to trigger MS.
I found this later point the most important of his talk. What is that 'something else' that is acting with CCSVI to trigger MS?
sbr487 wrote:It would have been great if Buffalo too, which found so many 'healthy' people with CCSVI should have tested for fMRI response of these people. And compared the same with fMRI response of healthy controls who did now show CCSVI. I think that would have been such an important data ...
I have been thoroughly tested for every bacterial and virus infection
Users browsing this forum: No registered users