This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 6:37 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Reality check for me
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:13 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 341
I had a good conversation with Dr. Siskin last evening. I wanted to share some information here. They are simple facts that he impressed on me about CCSVI and I’m sure he wouldn’t mind me sharing some of them.

He advised me not to get any more venograms (I have had 2), as having repeated venograms can present other problems. Non-invasive tests should be used when possible.

Treating the jugular veins are not the complete answer to MS, there is much more to it.

He stressed that although he’s done hundreds of procedures, he still doesn’t know why it helps some, and not others.

Stents are problematic and should be avoided. This is becoming more evident.

As for me, as soon as I get a clear answer on the state of my left IJV (two docs, two opinions), I am likely done with pursuing MS relief through CCSVI treatment. After 6 months of having hope to no avail, I need to move on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:43 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 228
So sorry to hear this... no doubt you are very disappointed. I hope in time that there will be more answers for you. There is so much going on research-wise right now that we should hold optimism for the future for more and better treatment options. Thanks for posting this-- and wish you the very best! Better days may still be ahead...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:58 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:00 pm
Posts: 200
Location: UK
I concur wholeheartedly with everything you've written and Dr Siskin has said pk. We have to judge our own boundaries as to how far we wish to go with this, but if things don't work out first time round I feel extremely cautious about how to proceed and personally now feel the need to take a back seat and re-evaluate. The next step for me I feel is crucial not to get wrong.

I've never felt comfortable with the prospect of stents and i'm glad that more and more surgeons are using them sparingly at the present time. Though of course I understand it disappoints those hoping for them, i'm not sure they should be used liberally at present.
I also feel more caution with repeat venoplasty should be advised at this stage, if the veins collapse through repeat surgeries there is little to no options left where perhaps a bit of patience may have seen more advancement and a better outcome. :roll:

_________________
28/07/10, 04/10/10, 16/11/10 - Dopplers x3 Ireland, Poland, Scotland.
12/10/10 - 1st procedure, Poland. Symptoms worsened. No improvement.
Verdict: I urge caution + am taking a back seat watching research ATM.
13/02/12 - Started Wheldon ABX protocol.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:22 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 341
I really only had the second venogram because I wanted to know what my lower veins looked like (MT), so the second time was locally and the doctor entered from both sides and checked it all.


Last edited by pklittle on Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:33 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8511
I'm glad you were able to consult with Dr. Siskin. Did he have anything to say that would give you that clear answer on the state of your left IJV? I think you have more than explored the possibilities of CCSVI, it has to be difficult to walk away. The docs will keep learning, they may not have answers today but I believe the answers will come.

Do you know what problems he saw with having repeat venograms? Is it the radiation or is it damage to the veins?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ccsvi
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 6:25 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 1240
Location: south western pa.
thanks for posting. although i only had it done once with not much out of it and now worsening i understand and feel your pain. i truly wish you the best and please let us know how you are doing. hopefully soon they will be to the point with this way of treating ms that it will help all of us.

although i will not try again at this point i want to keep an eye on things here to keep up with the good and bad and hope the good news outweighs the bad.

for me and others i hope our veins at least are not worse off. i thought just ballooning you shouldn't have much go wrong. but, there are cases coming out that are.

at least you got to talk to dr. sisken. i e-mailed the dr. that did me about a wk. ago as i had some questions. haven't heard back yet. i'm sure they are very busy--but? maybe tomorrow.

i hope you do well with whatever way you venture next.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 7:12 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 171
Location: QC, Canada
I agree that at one point we have to sit back and wait for more research to be done. I will after I feel that I have not been under treated. I was in the first 25 of my Dr in Poland and the 1st for the one in the states. I think they were conservator and also the way they surf the Azygos makes me want for more.

Dr Sinan and Dr Petrov both said that if there is no improvement right after the procedure it is because something was missed! I also like the low restenosis rate of Dr Sinan. Those were numbers in July, I wonder what they are now?

Dr Siskin talked about is 1/3,1/3,1/3 results in July, he has been treating seriously since march or april, after 8 months does he has statistics for re-stenosis? How come nobody asks him that? maybe it's less with smaller balloon or is it more? Is he using bigger balloons now?

Even with all the problems I encounter I am not ready to give up just yet - but soon
:cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 7:42 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 341
Cece, believe it or not the jury's still out on my left ijv. Dr Siskin did review my second images. I will be sending him my ultrasound images too.

Vivavie, I specifically asked Dr. Siskin if he is doing anything differently or more aggressively. He said no, the same as in June when I was treated.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:43 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 218
Location: Worcestershire, U.K
Hi pklittle,

I'm with you here. I've had it done twice now with some benefit but nothing miraculous, time will tell.

While I still believe that CCSVI has its place in the MS puzzle, its just a part and its time to watch and see what happens with the research, while still pushing for research in our own locations.

For me the theory is sound, but as patients there is not much else we can do, as campaigners however, I believe there is.

Claire


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:50 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 218
Location: Worcestershire, U.K
Vivavie - thats how I feel. Treated in Poland and I am convinced I have been under treated. I'm not confident that all veins were checked, and thats why I'm not ready to throw in the towel totally yet. I'll sit back though and see what happens in other locations......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:36 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 979
Location: Ucluluet, BC
Dr. Siskin is right, I'm sure - there is more to it than CCSVI. Dr. Simka has said that "MS" is CCSVI and an "unknown factor". I have believed for 18 years that bacteria is involved; Lyme, babeosis, whatever. I read the other day that certain bacteria can modify the endothelium... My first thought on CCSVI was what causes the stenosis?"

Two links for any who are interested:

http://www.canlyme.com

http://www.bacteriality.com/

It's just information.

_________________
My name is not really Johnson. MSed up since 1993


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. MS Liberation: Expectations and Reality

richardcampbell

11

1692

Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:16 am

PCakes View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Sanity check

TFau

0

917

Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:02 pm

TFau View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. check out some of my pics

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

costumenastional

27

2574

Sun May 16, 2010 8:30 am

costumenastional View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. check out this joker...

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

costumenastional

33

3306

Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:20 am

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. May-Thurner and MS/check it out

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

Katie41

62

8813

Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:39 am

magoo View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: