I'm not sure where you've taken the idea that they aren't following any and all leads and the very existence of this statement shows that it's in their minds. Could you define your perception of research because mine includes the act of following CCSVI developments. Have any of us lifted a test tube or conducted a clinical trial, yet every one of us considers that we have "researched" MS.
My perception of research, thanks for asking, is clinical trials in this case. They are conducting a number of clinical trials all involving drugs. The act of following CCSVI research is not enough when this center puts time and money towards research which will be published. I am just saying give CCSVI equal attention before dismissing it.
Again, it's fine when Zamboni says it because he's automatically on the "good guy" list, but it's diabolical coming from anyone who isn't fiendishly drooling over CCSVI?
I have never seen Zamboni take a hard stand saying this is absolutely proven. I would hardly say he is fiendishly drooling over CCSVI. Why do you take such a hard stand???
CCSVI WOULD be a fine ending to this nightmare of MS. The reason so many assume you take pleasure in seeing this fail, not just being a skeptic, is because the debates you hold on this forum are not contributing they are negative and distracting. I assume
that's just the way you like it.
The above considerations should always evoke rule number 1 which regards the fact that anyone here should either have MS or a loved one with MS and is either a heinous bastard or someone who would LOVE to see the end of MS YESTERDAY.
Rule number one here is to take a hard stand on one side or the other??? I have not seen too many people here do that. Most want to discuss CCSVI and do it in an informative and kind fashion.