This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 5:26 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Defining a syndrome
PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 2:02 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
CCSVIhusband wrote:
According to their logic codefellow ... that is correct. I'm sure they'll spin that statement and move the line once again!
:D While you are not a very likable person I do like to see people enjoying themselves and for that reason I, and I think most everyone else, is glad you've never been capable of realizing that you're on the losing end of every conversation.

Shortly ago you (incorrectly) berated someone for using a magazine article as a not authoritative enough reference, yet everyone else is nitpicking when you repeatedly are "just a little off" on your facts?

Let's come clean. You're trying to to make the pro CCSVI camp look incompetent, aren't you?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 2:14 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 474
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
^ spin ... and BS ...

you don't know me, nor if I'm likable. I'm quite sure, you're not likable. (in fact your interactions with past posters on this site who now only post about you on Facebook ... confirm that). EDIT - I'm pretty sure you're on Santa's naughty list.

I don't research every post, just try to reference people back to things. (EDIT - sometimes I refer to the wrong things, and that's OK because it's not my job to post on an MS forum like I suspect it is for some of the "skeptics" ... I have a real job). Reading cheer's studies is a lot more important than your petty arguments. I think everyone knows that.

The CCSVI tidal wave is building ... can't wait until it sweeps you away from this site! :lol:

Everyone else (according to Lyon) ... notice how they (the self described skeptics) never answer to the things actually asked, posted about, or in question. They always conveniently change the subject as to not be cornered and have to be held accountable for their statements? It's rather amusing. They know cheer's research is out there though ... oh and also notice how they don't challenge Dr. Sclafani with their BS statements they try to challenge everyone else with? because they know he'd burn their little playhouse down?


Last edited by CCSVIhusband on Sun Dec 05, 2010 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 2:23 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
^^ I rest my case!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 2:33 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 474
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
What does that prove? That you and your skeptic buddies are dragging down another thread about CCSVI? Great ... good post. You win now! You're so smart and sexy Bob ...

I'll let you continue though. We all see through you (especially everyone who has been liberated or has had loved ones liberated).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:01 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
CCSVIhusband wrote:
What does that prove? That you and your skeptic buddies are dragging down another thread about CCSVI?
Excellent point!

With it in mind that you would never drag a thread down with nonsense, please confirm your position on a higher plain to any doubters by linking us to the last piece of useful information YOU have posted here at thisisms. I have confidence in you and know that you won't stoop to the level of the 5 nasty skeptics and respond with some BS spin.

OK, we're ready.........................


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:23 pm 
You can be happy that 5 skeptics keep this forum active, because it would have already sunk in the backwater of false promises and lost hopes. Only a few fools think that the world revolves around them, others are aware of the laws of the universe.
The Liberation spark time has passed, those who have caught the last train still regret ...But remorse is in them, publicly they are too ashamed to express it. Searching for hope in restenosis ... and they are only the more deeply buried in the mud with no way out.
The solution is to turn to yourselves, living the life you deserve, to spend money on family and friends: MS is not a disease to die of. Just live yours life. Do not pay a quack for a false promise - them in mind is only their business, not your well-being.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:45 pm 
Offline
Volunteer Moderator

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:00 pm
Posts: 7617
rules of the board
Quote:
If you disagree with someone, please succinctly state why and let it go at that. Point, counterpoint, counter-counter point, etc. is not useful-- the reality is that after the first disagreement, you will rarely convince another of something they feel strongly about unless you have shocking new information to share. The drawn-out debates also turn people off from reading the messages in the first place. If you really have to get something off your chest, please send that person a Private Message-- there is no need to have a long argument in public.

_________________
my approach: no meds so far - just balanced whole foods (partial 'paleo', much less outright elimination), science, supplements, & bloodwork
my regimen - www.thisisms.com/ftopict-2489.html
www.whfoods.com, www.nutritiondata.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Prof Paulo Zamboni on CCSVI Syndrome

MarkW

6

1183

Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:22 pm

MarkW View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CRUCIAL PAPERS - CCSVI Syndrome by Team ZAMBONI

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

MarkW

64

6690

Sat Feb 02, 2013 5:12 am

MarkW View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Anyone contacted prof. Zamboni?

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

BBE

16

3118

Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:34 am

Rokkit View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Please, Help Prof. Zamboni official trials

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

Mattia

19

2982

Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:57 am

orion98665 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Franks CCSVI log - @Prof. Vogl Frankfurt

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

Frank

51

8993

Mon May 23, 2011 5:50 am

Thekla View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: