Lyon wrote:
a sensible person needs to look at the "facts" and the odds in this situation.
Lyon..Lyon...Lyon, I wish that you would look at the "facts". The fact is that there is NO scientific proof that treating CCSVI does not help people with MS. You can't have it both ways. If you are going to continually fall back on the "show me the proof" line, then those who believe that treating CCSVI is good can use the same argument. There is scientific proof. It is just not yet conclusive and has not yet been fully published.
Lyon wrote:
Going back to the beginning it needs to be recognized that over 90% of interesting MS theories turn out to be dust in the wind under further scrutiny.
Again, a misleading statement. How does this fact actually impact the validity of the CCSVI theories? Because others are wrong does not make this wrong. We need proof that it is wrong.
Lyon wrote:
the theory of CCSVI would/should have died a silent death before most had ever even heard of it,
I don't think the 100's (1000's ?) of people who have benefited from CCSVI treatment would agree with you. I thank God for all those who continue to fight against those who want this to die.
Lyon wrote:
All in all, a situation tailor made for Webster's definition of "placebo".
I thought the placebo argument was long dead. Are you really going to cling to the idea that everything you read from first-hand experience and everything you see on the videos is placebo. This would be the greatest placebo effect in the history of mankind! If my wife’s results are placebo that we need to change Webster’s definition.
I work in the field of scientific research. Dr. Zamboni did what every good scientist does. He did excellent research, to the limits of his resourses, and he published his findings as well as his hypothesis. The scientific community is then welcomed to comment and do further research. Dr. Zamboni has always welcomed this and it is happening as it should. The problem is with people like you who attack Dr. Zamboni's theory by using the approach that if it is not 100% correct then it is 100% wrong. This is not how it is in the real world, but it is an approach that many people are using to try to discredit his work.
I doubt that Dr. Banting and Dr. Best knew everything about insulin when they first published their findings, yet they are regarded as medical heroes. I believe that Dr. Zamboni will go down in history as a medical hero. Of course, this is just my opinion. I don't have scientific proof....yet.
Bruce.