This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 1:38 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:16 am 
Offline
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 3
IJ valve question: There are theories out there about a dysfunctional IJ valve contributing to this cerebral venous hypertension....my (albeit maybe not very scientific) question is:

Are they postulating that the valve is open all the time, leading to reflux from the heart back to the brain during times where the IJ veins are most often open (sleep/supine) or when central (body) pressures are elevated like when you cough, etc? Or is it that the valve is largely closed off, a blockage in this area leading to reflux into brain? Or is it a bit of both??

In the first scenario, I'm not sure how a valve resection with cutting balloons would help, though a regular balloon angioplasty may somewhat relieve pressures (?) though I'm not sure about that either.

In the second maybe a resection would help, with a balloon angioplasty.

If it were a mixed bag, I'm not sure which way would be best...then again I'm not a specialist, but it would be nice to have a specialist's opinion...any takers? :)

I think any sort of valve resecting procedure should potentially address potential future complications, upstream and downstream from the valve. I also think this is an important issue, open vs. closed, rather than saying 'dysfunctional'. Maybe it's both? I'm no expert, just curious about all of this, and a stickler for details;)

I guess my bottom line is this: the valve is there for a reason. If it were just venous stenosis that was the issue, and there was no valve, I would agree to balloon away, and that would solve everything, likely free of consequence....there is a valve there though, and it's there for a reason. Removing it may solve major issues, though I have a hard time believing a valve-less person runs less risks of other potential complications down the line than a person with an intact interal jugular vein valve.


Maybe just waiting for an internal jugular replacement, valve and all:

http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/4005 ... helf-veins


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. 1/3 of all people have internal jugular valve incompetence

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

Hopeful10

22

3852

Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:47 pm

Leonard View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Internal jugular vein valve incompetence

NHE

1

1666

Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:49 am

NHE View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Getting to know your internal jugular vein too....

Cece

8

959

Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:52 am

1eye View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Internal jugular morphology and CCSVI

eric593

0

673

Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:34 am

eric593 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Ligation of internal jugular vein

dreddk

7

1659

Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:19 pm

1eye View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: