This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

This is where part of our disagreement comes in I think. When studies obtain results that are not to your liking you immediately call them negative. While I am not thrilled that these studies SEEM to be showing CCSVI does not play as great(or maybe any) role in MS as Zamboni initially hypothesized, that does not mean the results are "negative". The researchers obtained these results and they released them. Period. As far as the implied grand neuro conspiracy to skew the results in a certain direction well I guess if people want to tell themselves that it is their prerogative. For the record I have respect for vascular specialists and neuros who are trying to solve the "mystery" of MS and I especially respect those who call it as they see it no matter what people want to hear.

It may be within the capability of others to decide not to die, in spite of how expensive, slow, invasive or painful the treatment might be. The alternative is bound to address most of those concerns, but may not be considered, especially when there is only one treatment on the menu, and a lot of people say it is a good one. You can't take it with you.

Hell, even treatments for RR'MS' sometimes kill you anyway.

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'_MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience