Lyon wrote:
Cece wrote:
Lyon, did you have a chance to read what I posted recently about permissive lesions? Option #4 is that the abnormal veins tip people over into having MS when a secondary factor is involved (a multitude of abnormal veins? a hyperactive immune system?). Treatment is to treat the permissive lesion(s).
This is going to sound and be taken as nasty, inflammatory or intentionally argumentative but honestly isn't intended that way, therefore the following is all I have to say on the matter so that this doesn't end up being another locked thread.
Considering that Zamboni first proposed CCSVI as a factor in MS, before CCSVI became a point of consideration it should have first been convincingly shown that people with MS more have venous obstructions more often and more seriously than "normals" and to date that still waits to be shown.
Considering that most basic and necessary factor remains to be proven I can't justify spending any more time on reading, consideration or arguing how something that might not even exists, works.
Good, I look forward to not having to argue with you then ... but since you won't be around to read this (as you stated above, it's not worth you reading any more), I guess you won't know it HAS been proven to exist more in MS patients than "normals".
http://www.bnac.net/wp-content/uploads/ ... _ccsvi.pdf
Also ... Dr. Zamboni's initial trial was blinded.
I guess you just choose what studies you want to use though.
Move that bar now ... and tell us how BNAC wasn't good enough ... or Dr. Zamboni is (well just laugh because zambonis are used to clean an ice-rink) - oh wait, since you're not reading about CCSVI any more ... I guess you can't. (I suspect one of your fellow skeptics will alert you to this information though - or post in your stead).
News 
Site map 
SitemapIndex 
RSS Feed 
Login
Register
FAQ
