This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 12:21 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:46 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: southern California
Blocked cerebral bloodflow creates a disease that is mis-diagnosed as MS. Similar MRI presentation, similar symptoms. A vascular disease. hmmm.

Quote:
A devastating vascular disorder of the brain called CADASIL, which strikes young adults and leads to early dementia, often is misdiagnosed as multiple sclerosis, Loyola University Health System researchers report. CADASIL occurs when thickening of blood vessel walls blocks blood flow in the brain. The early manifestation is migraine headaches, progressing to strokes and mini strokes, depression, apathy, motor disability and executive dysfunction (inability to plan and organize everyday activities.) The final symptom is dementia.

CADASIL is caused by mutations of a single gene called NOTCH 3. If an individual carries the mutated gene, he or she inevitably will develop the disease, and there's a 50 percent chance that each of the individual's children will inherit the mutation and the disease.

Researchers conducted an exhaustive series of genetic, physical and psychological tests and exams on 11 CADASIL patients. "We found a delay in the detection of this pathology and previous diagnostic errors in some patients and their relatives," researchers wrote. "Multiple sclerosis was the most frequent misdiagnosis."

The study is published in Revista de Neurologia (Journal of Neurology) in Spain.

The study was a subset of a larger study to determine whether the Alzheimer's disease drug donepezil (trade name, Aricept®) can help in CADASIL patients. This larger study found there generally was no benefit to the drug.

CADASIL stands for cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. It was realistically portrayed by one of the main characters in the critically acclaimed 2004 movie "The Sea Inside."

"It is a terrible disease that runs in families, and unfortunately we as yet don't have effective treatments," said Dr. José Biller, senior author of the study and chairman of the Department of Neurology of Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.

There are several reasons why CADASIL is misdiagnosed as MS. Both diseases tend to strike young adults. There are similarities in brain MRIs, and both diseases can cause focal neurologic signs and symptoms.

While there currently are no effective treatments, researchers are making significant progress in better understanding CADASIL, Biller said. "The field is exploding, and there is hope down the road that there will be new treatments for these patients," Biller said.

link

cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:17 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 445
Location: colorado
But these aren't demyelinating lesions, are they?

I'm not sure where this fits into the CCSVI hypothesis...?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:22 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 525
Well, reading their report maybe they could have said better that MS appears in CADASIL patients.

They did not prove that CADASIL lesions are not MS. In fact it is impossible to prove that without a pathological definition of MS, which does not exists, as far as I know.

_________________
You can get a worldwide list of available sites for CCSVI at http://www.ccsviclinic.info


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:49 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 329
hmmm what? An animal with 4 legs wagging their tail in not necessarily a dog, but Neurologists are trained to detect MS, so they detect MS. Zamboni is trained to detect blocked veins, so he sees blocked veins, especially in a sample that is not blind and not randomized.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:48 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 440
CADASIL is frequently misdiagnosed as MS. In one of my support groups we had a woman whose husband ended up being redx'd as CADASIL so we talked a lot about this. The husband was only correctly diagnosed after persistent research by the family, because he had such cognitive trouble. The lesions can appear very similar. And the picture can be more or less aggressive, so absolutely this can be mistaken for MS, especially since many, many people who are given an MS diagnosis do NOT get an exhaustive diagnostic workup.

One of the biggest things I am always pointing is that up to 10 percent of people who have an MS diagnosis have been misdiagnosed. And that very few people get a truly thorough workup, or get followed to see if the original MS diagnosis still holds after a period of time.

It's not quite this simple, but a person presents to the doctor with a set of symptoms that could be anything from genetic disease to malabsorption to toxic poisoning to vascular disease to brain tumors toeven normal blips . . . the differential is VAST, and the lesions are more alike than you would think! MS is what's left when they can't find a different diagnosis. For some people, a persistent doctor will still find a different diagnosis years after the initial MS diagnosis.

Again, that's reductive, because there is a set of "classic" MS presentations, symptoms, and progression. But there are also plenty of misdiagnosed people, and plenty of amazing other potential diagnosis possibilities out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:49 am 
Offline
Volunteer Moderator

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:00 pm
Posts: 7631
squiffy posted this research too... interesting bluesky.. it would be interesting to see a list of significant differences between CADISIL and CCSVI.

i agree, typically there does not seem to be enough work done on the 'other plausible explanation' part of the msdx process!

_________________
my approach: no meds so far - just balanced whole foods (partial 'paleo', much less outright elimination), science, supplements, & bloodwork
my regimen - www.thisisms.com/ftopict-2489.html
www.whfoods.com, www.nutritiondata.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:06 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2568
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
Here, I've got an idea...

A randomized, blinded clinical trial with a sample size of, say, 100 neurologists. We ask patients with a known diagnosis of 'MS' and patients with a known diagnosis of CADASIL to participate. They are randomized, and each neurologist is asked to diagnose these patients. The neurologists are not told what the patients have. As far as they know, these are all legitimate, undiagnosed referrals.

Each doctor is told that for one month all new patients will potentially be part of a randomized trial and will potentially have a known disease that no-one but the database will know about.

The patients are not blinded to the facts of the trial, so their knowledge that this is a test, along with their acting ability and ability to keep a straight face are crucial. They can be put through practice runs to get them used to the idea, and they can be asked to do the same with several doctors, blinding them at least to which one is the real "physician under test".

Known sufferers of various diseases are used to further randomize the tests, and again nobody but the database knows who has what.

No results identifying any patients or doctors are made public. Only the statistics.

Anybody up for it?

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:37 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 38
Dr. Zamboni's study of the safety and efficacy of balloon angioplasty for CCSVI was an open label study and there is nothing wrong with that. Pharmaceutical companies and other researchers normally start investigations with open label studies. The conclusion of Dr. Zamboni's open label study is appropriate: that a further randomized control study was needed. It really is not accurate to assume that the study Dr. Zamboni and his colleagues conducted is not valuable or scientific because it was an open label study, nor is it accurate to assume that all studies are immediately double-blinded, randomized clinical trials.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 106
Location: USA
Asher wrote:
Zamboni is trained to detect blocked veins, so he sees blocked veins, especially in a sample that is not blind


...but Zamboni's group also found CCSVI in a blinded study of 16 pwMS and 8 healthy controls. In that study they found CCSVI using doppler ultrasound in 100% of the psMS and in 0% of the healthy controls. 100 percent accuracy! The likelihood that this would occur by chance is extremely small.

http://www.thisisms.com/ftopict-15806.html

Color doppler ultrasound could eventually become the fastest, most accurate and affordable way for doctors to diagnose MS. If a person presenting with MS symptoms isn't found to also have CCSVI through ultrasound testing, then it would be time to start looking for an alternate diagnosis!

_________________
DX 6-09 RRMS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:25 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 440
Here's a recent thread that also brings up CADASIL, along with some other interesting abstracts and info about cerebral hypoperfusion. Curioser and curioser.

http://www.thisisms.com/ftopict-15671.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:34 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2988
Location: Brooklyn, New York
ThisIsMA wrote:
Asher wrote:
Zamboni is trained to detect blocked veins, so he sees blocked veins, especially in a sample that is not blind


...but Zamboni's group also found CCSVI in a blinded study of 16 pwMS and 8 healthy controls. In that study they found CCSVI using doppler ultrasound in 100% of the psMS and in 0% of the healthy controls. 100 percent accuracy! The likelihood that this would occur by chance is extremely small.

http://www.thisisms.com/ftopict-15806.html

Color doppler ultrasound could eventually become the fastest, most accurate and affordable way for doctors to diagnose MS. If a person presenting with MS symptoms isn't found to also have CCSVI through ultrasound testing, then it would be time to start looking for an alternate diagnosis!


The definition of multiple sclerosis includes exclusion of other causes of demyelination

If a known cause of demyelinzation was excluded in error by missing or misinterpreting testing and MS was then diagnosed, it would be a false positive diagnosis for MS.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:50 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: southern California
A differential diagnosis is the right of every pwMS---there are literally 100 other diseases that are supposed to be checked before an MS dx is made. Add CADISIL to the list....these are demyelinating lesions and a presentation which mirrors MS. I believe extracranial venous malformations must be added, as well.

In the 1980s, when APS was being established by Dr. Hughes, there was a pushback from neurology to include this blood disorder as a differential. Because MS isn't supposed to look like a vascular disease. And now it is on the officlal list.
http://www.hughes-syndrome.org/overview.htm

And now we add CADASIL---

Here are the differential diagnosis from Univerisity of Wisconsin, which include cerebrovascular disease, TIA, stroke, vasculitis and Hughes.
http://www.neurology.wisc.edu/publicati ... euro_2.pdf

cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:53 am 
Offline
Volunteer Moderator

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:00 pm
Posts: 7631
in my case during ddx they did not listen to me about history of b12 deficiency. it's a much longer story than this but, there was one old test on my file that had a clean read of b12 level without supplements. it didn't show up on my doc's graph because it was a text string 'less than 75', not a number the computer could plot. the rest is history :S

_________________
my approach: no meds so far - just balanced whole foods (partial 'paleo', much less outright elimination), science, supplements, & bloodwork
my regimen - www.thisisms.com/ftopict-2489.html
www.whfoods.com, www.nutritiondata.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:05 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 106
Location: USA
drsclafani wrote:
The definition of multiple sclerosis includes exclusion of other causes of demyelination

If a known cause of demyelinzation was excluded in error by missing or misinterpreting testing and MS was then diagnosed, it would be a false positive diagnosis for MS.


Interesting, but if it turns out that 100% of pwMS have CCSVI, then either they will have to conclude that no one has MS, or they will have to change their definition of MS to include CCSVI.

The current definition of MS is pretty goofy anyway. Since they don't know what the cause of MS is, how can they exclude "other causes"? Other causes besides what? Other causes besides no known cause?

_________________
DX 6-09 RRMS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:21 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 440
Great article. I disagree about the psychiatric conclusion, since so many of the differentials include "psychiatric" issues as part of their presentation, but otherwise a fascinating read.

(Just a few obvious ones -- celiac disease can first present as depression, schizophrenia, and psychosis; MS itself directly causes depression and bipolar issues; porphyria is widely known for its psychiatric features; and many, many of the other differentials specifically mention dementia, etc. I mean, think about it -- how can you have a disease affecting your brain and NOT have some sort of effect on your psychological expression??)

I bet some of us are wondering about the MS dx right now. :-)

I personally have never been confident in my own dx because I have so many "red flags" and have not had a typical course -- more aggressive, more disability, etc. Maybe I'll take this list to the doctor.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. not ccsvi but vascular brain disease often misdiagnosed ms

blossom

0

246

Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:09 pm

blossom View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. MS as a Vascular Disease

patientx

1

1134

Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:00 am

lyndacarol View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Vascular Disease among Hospitalized MS patients

Jamie

3

1294

Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:36 am

Jamie View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Vascular disease worsens MS progression

Perkele

10

1701

Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:47 am

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. lyme disease produces vascular changes

frodo

10

2102

Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:30 pm

elyse_peace View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blossom


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: