hwebb wrote:Hi Scorp - thanks for the promotion of this article!
Lots of newcomers are looking at the CCSVI Australia Facebook site since it's publication.
Not sure if you could say that the people who write on CCSVI Australia are "anonymous". We all appear in public regularly, arranging and attending awareness events. Have personally written to countless media outlets and politicians to raise awareness of this issue. The CCSVI Australia administrators are available anytime the media would like to cover the CCSVI issue.
On the Australian Facebook page and other internet forums such as thisisms.com, neurologists are referred to by name and accused of ignoring evidence proving Zamboni's theory.
Brainteaser wrote:On the Australian Facebook page and other internet forums such as thisisms.com, neurologists are referred to by name and accused of ignoring evidence proving Zamboni's theory.
This quote was from a newspaper article, apparently being relied upon by the author of this thread and directed cynically towards the bona fides of those involved with CCSVI Australia.
But what about the second leg of the quote? Thisisms has been disparaged also. Have neurologists been named and shamed on this site? Reading the thread, it seems as if the member commencing the thread has been primarily motivated in putting the boots into CCSVI Australia rather than keeping things in perspective about a newspaper article where this site is attacked also.
jay123 wrote:My neuro told me this week that he is not happy with the AAN. They are having their annual convention this week (in Hawaii, of course!) and they actually rejected all papers with positive CCSVI results! They only accepted negative studies. he also mentioned that they have been getting the same answer from many neuro journals.
Seems to me there is a group of doctors getting a little worried about their bread and butter!!
scorpion wrote:How exciting. This should really pick up the traffic on MS or make people run the other way
Lyon wrote:If the world really is so full of devious people as the Neuros and Pharmas are reputed to be, the battle is probably already lost anyway.
scorpion wrote:Honestly I do no see a problem with neurologists being singled out by name as long as there are no threats against them, veiled or otherwise.
Lyon wrote:This must be a little of what that Australian newspaper article was hinting on eh Scorpion?
Intelligent lot too when all you have to do is dig a hole and not bother to cover it with sticks and leaves.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users