This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 10:49 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:20 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
MrSuccess wrote:
If you find out any information about the missing 14 % ...... post it.
Although it isn't appreciated here, that article isn't obscure in that the Annals Of Neurology isn't obscure.

I've got a team working on finding those missing percentages as we speak.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:58 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 582
Location: Greece
So what is the problem with "negative" studies? They are not really negative. They are food for thought and will definitely help in improving our knowledge about what CCSVI is and what CCSVI is not.

For example, plethysmography was inspired by the other "negative" Doep's study. There is no other way to make science move. Let's just think and remain in this reality.

_________________
Shortest joke: "We may not be able to cure MS but we can manage its symptoms."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Another negative study in Annals of Neurology (part 2)

patientx

0

708

Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:27 am

patientx View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Annals of Neurology (what the neuros are reading)

Cece

6

1241

Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:57 am

CCSVIhusband View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dr. Zamboni's letter published in the Annals of Neurology

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

cheerleader

23

3180

Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:04 pm

ms2009 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. ANNALS of Neurology, Letter to the Editor, Avruscio G., MD

gigi26970

13

2330

Tue Jun 21, 2011 2:07 pm

MrSuccess View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Latest Annals of Neurology article on Dake & Stanford

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

tzootsi

33

6995

Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:11 am

Sotiris View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: