Whats a matter Lyon, participating in the other thread where you commented on this wasn't enough, had to go find another copy of the article and put your own spin on it? lol. Seriously dude.
Why is it the two guys who rarely even read the studies they post or comment on (while commenting on others comments), are ever so quick to plaster every provocative media headline they can find, then bemoan the tragedy of people nibbling at the bait?
Make sure to find the one that says "so called liberation" in the first paragraph too.
This is the level of your inquiry?
So these are the caliber of responses to be seen in response to two recent legitimate and unfavorable CCSVI studies?? The "science" of overcooked meat on the bbq and that the researchers are on the take? http://www.thisisms.com/ftopic-16122-0.html
I will note for the record you are now precisely mimicking Scorpion's MO, that is, find the provocative headline, more the better, post new thread of oft-discussed material, sans commentary, wait for responses, then feign ignorance, all the while proclaiming mere curiosity.
What's the point? We've all seen the info, why do we need to know what a particular reporter that isn't even familiar with the info has to say about it?
lol@ "shoots hole", how scientific can you get?
RRMS Dx'd 2007, first episode 2004. Bilateral stent placement, 3 on left, 1 stent on right, at Stanford August 2009. Watch my operation video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwc6QlLVtko
, Virtually symptom free since, no relap