So these are the caliber of responses to be seen in response to two recent legitimate and unfavorable CCSVI studies?? The "science" of overcooked meat on the bbq and that the researchers are on the take? http://www.thisisms.com/ftopic-16122-0.html
se1956 wrote:Till now this should be reliable enough:
But it should be confirmed (or not) by clinical trials.
MarkW wrote:'Liberation Theory' does not exist so neuros are able to shoot holes in it. They are joined by the naysayer Lyon. Expression 'tilting at windmills' comes to mind.
If anyone wants to see open label data from de-stenosis go to:
http://ameds.co/about-us/recent-informa ... centrum,37 Physician recorded data.
I am not recommending this clinic as they use stents occasionally.
Robnl wrote:another view on the BNAC study
“We can point to a number of different factors that could point to closure of the veins, but we don’t have an answer,” [Zivadinov] said. “Our message on CCSVI is definitely we should proceed to understand why people who have progressive forms have much more prevalence of this phenomenon.”
Users browsing this forum: gibbledygook