dianabee wrote:Thank you, Cece. The letter clearly states that the treatment is not covered for ms patients. Since the link between CcSVI and ms has not been made (at least officially via trials), my point is that IRs should be evaluating and treating patients irrespective of any MS diagnosis. Why would CcSVI need to be linked to ms in order to be treated??
If there are any IRs out there (dr scalifiani?) can you please take a moment to consider this and comment? Why does ms need to be on the diagnosis for a reimbursement request?
1eye wrote:Do not use the word multiple, do not use the word sclerosis, especially do not use them together, and avoid the initials 'MS' altogether, like the plague. What did it ever do for you?
Instruct all the people involved in your health care that you would like them to do the same and that you will not admit to any further association with these words or this term.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users