So the euphoria is died down a little. I think that is to be totally expected. We are seeing the results of stents gone bad, insurance denials, and frustrations with government inaction.
scorpion wrote:So the euphoria is died down a little. I think that is to be totally expected. We are seeing the results of stents gone bad, insurance denials, and frustrations with government inaction.
You forgot to metion the recent trial results that are showing nothing even near the 100% correlation between CCSVI and MS that we were originally told. As the percentages dip lower and lower, the euphoria dips lower and lower.
fogdweller wrote:Yes, scientific scepticism is good all the way around, but even with some regression toward the mean in correlation between CCSVI and MS, it is pretty clear there is something there. Some of us were hopeful that this was in fact a rather difinitive cause, which a 1:1 correlation would have suggested, but even with less than that, it is clearly important. Now to figure out why and how.
Some of us were hopeful that this was in fact a rather difinitive cause, which a 1:1 correlation would have suggested, but even with less than that, it is clearly important. Now to figure out why and how.
1eye wrote: It's deliberately, sadistically slow when it depends on the neurologists and the MS Societies and the so-called disease-modifying drug sellers for support. None is likely forthcoming, if there is the microscopic chance that the research will reveal the truth about "MS", anything new about CCSVI, or its treatment.
I am afraid there are facts of life, like the way neurologists do "MS" research, and the way the mafia does business, that have to be put up with much of the time.
I cannot agree with this...
Return to Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users