This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 12:25 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 10:01 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 326
Pardon me if this was already posted - I searched for it but did not see it anywhere:

http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01384825

Quote:
The presence of abnormalities in the cerebral venous circulation, defined as Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI), has recently been reported in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), in healthy subjects and in subjects with other neurological diseases. These reports have aroused much interest both in the scientific world and, above all, among the communities of patients and Associations having the aim of aiding people with MS and of promoting scientific research into this disease.

In the literature published so far there is a lack of verification in large samples of the prevalence of CCSVI in MS compared with that observed in healthy subjects and in those with other diseases of the nervous system.

This is an observational study investigating the prevalence of CCSVI in subjects with MS and comparing it with the prevalence observed in a control population consisting of Healthy Controls (HC) and in a population affected by other neurological diseases of the central nervous system of degenerative, vascular, inflammatory and autoimmune origin.

A total of at least 1,200 adults with MS will be included in the study, as well as 400 healthy subjects and 400 subjects with other neurodegenerative diseases.


Results should be interesting!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:55 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 200
Location: Central FL ( near Ocala)
The problem with these studies is that they usually use a technician dependent method to find the reflux/blockages.

Venography is the "gold standard" and even venography(fluoroscopy) has missed things that IVUS has found.

In some studies they used relatives (this should have been excluded)

In some studies the ultrasound technicians didn't have adequate training.

So when these places are designing studies they should look for methods that are "fool proof". Many lives are influenced on the results, so care should be taken to ensure accuracy.

When reading study results I would encourage people to read details. What methods did they use? Were there exclusions or inclusions and why? Were there conflicts of interest? Who assessed the patients and what did they use to measure. Who sponsored the research? Does the total match the results?

I would trust studies like Dr David Hubbards fMRI BOLD study- the results are totally objective and measurable.

_________________
Cat (Catherine Somerville on FB)
MegansMom
My 35 yo daughter is newly dx 8/19/10 (had 12 symptoms)
Dx with Type A CCSVI- 1 IJV & double "candy wrapper" appearance of her Azygos
Venoplasty done Sept 21, 2010
Doing extremely well-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:13 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8507
There are careers to made in CCSVI, particularly by those who get their papers out first, which will then be cited by others, and be seen as foundational work. Hastiness works against the sort of care in trial design that is desirable. There also seems to be an assumption that CCSVI is or should be easy to find regardless of the methods (and since methods aren't standardized yet, we get all sorts). Funding is another limiting factor.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. CCSVI Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis

ccsvifoundation

7

1183

Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:36 am

whyRwehere View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Ccsvi As the Cause of Multiple Sclerosis: The Science Behind

happydance

12

2476

Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:55 pm

cheerleader View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CCSVI in Multiple Sclerosis Journal

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

MarkW

15

1762

Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:58 am

1eye View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. The science and politics of CCSVI and Multiple Sclerosis

squiffy2

1

954

Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:02 am

tazbo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. The science and politics of CCSVI and Multiple Sclerosis

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

erinc14

55

4675

Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:07 am

erinc14 View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: