This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 5:35 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 1:38 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8508
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0004-282X ... ci_arttext
Quote:
The internet access

The Google search for "CCSVI multiple sclerosis" yielded over 650,000 results. The top result was a link to a clinic offering CCSVI evaluation services and MS liberation therapy (www.ccsvi-online.com), followed by the CCSVI Foundation (www.ccsvifoundation.org), which on its front page, reported on a patient who was denied the "liberation" treatment and filed a human rights complaint. Other links on the initial Google page led to pages explaining that there was a plot among neurologists to avoid referring patients to vascular surgeons because neurologists refused to believe in CCSVI (www.multiplesclerosissurgery.com). In addition, links to www.youtube.com presented over 700 videos of successful "liberation" treatment. The search on Yahoo! yielded over 80,000 results, including www.ccsvi-multiple-sclerosis.com, in which doctors willing to perform the liberation treatment could be located around the world, and www.ccsvi-for-ms.org, which advertised using the slogan "Liberation from Multiple Sclerosis - Free yourself".

Both Google and Yahoo! have several links accessing Facebook. The social network www.facebook.com contains dozens of discussion forums and social/charity events relating to CCSVI and MS. The largest CCSVI community on Facebook has nearly 30,000 participants. Although several participants are dubious about "liberation" treatment or have undergone it without success, the tone of the discussion is extremely optimistic.

TIMS is the birthplace of the CCSVI internet movement. Seriously, we've got creds. When I google "CCSVI multiple sclerosis," we pop up on the first page. I would've liked a mention!
Quote:
During the European Congress of Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) in October 2010, in Gothenburg, Sweden, Zamboni explained that the term "liberation" originated from a radiologist talking about blood vessels with insufficient blood flow. The talk of "blood flow liberation in the vessel" mutated into "liberation treatment for MS" in very little time.

And that is where the term 'liberation' came from...but it's a media term, particularly in Canada. We are not responsible for that term. We are, however, responsible for the term, "Liberati," which remains very catchy. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:30 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 414
Location: LeftCoast Canada
Without the wicked internet, we'd be in for another 150-year wait c/w finger2nose + DMDs. It's not science that is under seige but rather neuros. And they clearly don't like it. :o

_________________
Albany 2010. Brooklyn 2011
Hurry up and wait.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: .
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:56 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
.


Last edited by Lyon on Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:04 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8508
PointsNorth, I agree. It's thanks to the internet that I had the procedure done, and thanks to the procedure being done that I feel better. Small miracles....

Lyon, when I mentioned creds, it was in respect to TIMS being the origin of the internet social media phenomenon of CCSVI. You were here then, I wasn't! I brought up the google search because that was the method used by the author of the article.

Dr. Siskin also had an abstract about social media and CCSVI. TIMS got mentioned by name in that one: http://tinyurl.com/3o5g3lt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:24 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 296
Zamboni told me it was Dr. Fabrizio Salvi who used the term 'liberation' for free blood flow, hence he called it that. Hmmm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:06 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: southern California
it really doesn't matter who gets credit...since this paper, like others on the social media influence in medicine (w/the exception of Siskin's), is trying to downplay the science by highlighting you tube videos and medical tourism sites. It's just as well TIMS didn't get a mention in that company :)

The truth of the matter is that it is the researchers--Dake, Haacke, Zamboni, Zivadinov, Siskin, Mehta, Sclafani, Hubbard, et al--who are keeping CCSVI in front of their colleagues by speaking on their research at international vascular and endovascular conferences and publishing in medical journals. CCSVI would not be a blip on google if it weren't for their work. "Cause Jeff couldn't have fixed his jugular veins himself....
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:52 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
.


Last edited by Lyon on Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:14 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 520
Location: Hawaii
if we want tims to be on the forefront, we need to push upper cervical care treatment pre and post diagnoses, imo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Cochrane review
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:01 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 398
Location: Fredericton, Canada
Folks, I have been asked to help in a Cochrane review of CCSVI research to date. Cochrane reviews are well respected and provide an opportunity to steer the medical community toward adopting new techniques quicker, if warranted, and to identify gaps in current research. I would like our CCSVI community to help by producing a bibliography of relevant research literature concerning CCSVI and its treatment. The people I'm working with probably have most of the important references we might supply, but this way we reduce the risks of gaps. Joan and Marie will help a lot, I hope, but I'm sure that there are others who can help, as well. Please send me a message and I'll e-mail you the draft objectives and initial bibliography. Info about Cochrane reviews can be found at http://www.Cochrane.org.
...Ted

_________________
Dx SPMS in 2004.  Liberated 29/04/2010.
My blog: www.my-darn-ms.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cochrane review
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:22 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: southern California
fiddler wrote:
Folks, I have been asked to help in a Cochrane review of CCSVI research to date. Cochrane reviews are well respected and provide an opportunity to steer the medical community toward adopting new techniques quicker, if warranted, and to identify gaps in current research. I would like our CCSVI community to help by producing a bibliography of relevant research literature concerning CCSVI and its treatment. The people I'm working with probably have most of the important references we might supply, but this way we reduce the risks of gaps. Joan and Marie will help a lot, I hope, but I'm sure that there are others who can help, as well. Please send me a message and I'll e-mail you the draft objectives and initial bibliography. Info about Cochrane reviews can be found at http://www.Cochrane.org.
...Ted


Great news, Ted. Love the Cochrane Reviews-- Thanks for taking this on. Preliminary research info can be found at CCSVI Alliance (we need to update our site, but most of the research is there:
link to research
I'll PM my e-mail, so you can send the info along. Will be wonderful to have a representation of all the research, neurological and vascular...but it won't be an easy job to compile :)
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:56 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
.


Last edited by Lyon on Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:05 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8508
Here is recently published research that found CCSVI by both catheter venogram and MRV: http://tinyurl.com/66vc33c

Lyon, it does go both ways, I look forward to clarity on these issues (mainly the association between CCSVI and MS and the usefulness of the CCSVI venoplasty procedure.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:16 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 445
Location: colorado
Lyon wrote:
The article opening this thread, as do most other recent articles, except those written by Zamboni, puts into question the very existence of ccsvi.


I don't agree, but even if it were true, at least we're stirring the pot. 150 years of MS research and we have very little to show for it. Finally someone (ie everyone involved in this research) has the cajones to challenge the status quo. That's what innovation is all about.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 2:44 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 520
Location: Hawaii
http://uprightdoctor.wordpress.com/
http://www.upright-health.com/index.html

checkout this site and read through the entire site. if you look at it with an open mind as you did with ccsvi youll find alot of gaps and explanations filled.

maybe if we can get other dr's to read this with an open mind too, we can get ccsvi working for everybody for good no resurgery every year.

with ccsvi being so new, why are people dismissing upper cervical care :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:27 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2567
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
ikulo wrote:
Lyon wrote:
The article opening this thread, as do most other recent articles, except those written by Zamboni, puts into question the very existence of ccsvi.


I don't agree, but even if it were true, at least we're stirring the pot. 150 years of MS research and we have very little to show for it. Finally someone (ie everyone involved in this research) has the cajones to challenge the status quo. That's what innovation is all about.


While they might just be fronts for the nay-sayers, I think the Cochrane review is highly regarded, and it is unlikely that they would be interested in meta-analysis of things anyone seriously thinks don't exist. I suppose anything is possible but I doubt it. The fact that Neurology is still willing to fan those embers shows what terrible damage has been done in the name of Science, by people who should know better, IMO.

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. New research into MS gets go-ahead

Cece

0

767

Tue Aug 23, 2011 4:58 pm

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zamboni's newest abstract - Epublished ahead of print, 8/09

HappyPoet

1

1202

Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:06 am

gibbledygook View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Internet considered harmful

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

1eye

17

1878

Sat Aug 06, 2011 9:48 pm

1eye View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Rough Internet Statics on CCSVI

CureOrBust

3

664

Mon Nov 07, 2011 2:36 pm

1eye View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. The Internet and the Emergence of CCSVI: A Research Project

jekelly

3

812

Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:45 am

MarkW View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: