This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 12:30 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 10:07 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2567
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
I was going to ask, why do we have to put up with topic titles that are so bellicose, volatile, inflammatory, deliberately misleading, even? But I realized that the people who matter and get read in this forum are provoked to argue, and end up interacting with each other, so the whole thing has some sort of built-in governance, that depends on everyone's good natures. I suppose that is one case where the medium is part of the message, or something.

Anyway, I was just thinking, maybe one of the reasons for the high rate of restenosis is leaflets coming back from the dead, and maybe we are in a hurry to just balloon the heck out of whatever is obviously right now getting in the way of the flow, without stepping back and planning a more lasting fix. I don't know. Is anything more lasting going to be tried, or are we happy to just get periodic retreatments?

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 10:47 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 375
1eye wrote:
I was going to ask, why do we have to put up with topic titles that are so bellicose, volatile, inflammatory, deliberately misleading, even? But I realized that the people who matter and get read in this forum are provoked to argue, and end up interacting with each other, so the whole thing has some sort of built-in governance, that depends on everyone's good natures. I suppose that is one case where the medium is part of the message, or something.

Anyway, I was just thinking, maybe one of the reasons for the high rate of restenosis is leaflets coming back from the dead, and maybe we are in a hurry to just balloon the heck out of whatever is obviously right now getting in the way of the flow, without stepping back and planning a more lasting fix. I don't know. Is anything more lasting going to be tried, or are we happy to just get periodic retreatments?
I think it is going to take more than interaction. To get the job done it will also require co-operation. There is a fat chance of that when we're getting all this polarized posturing by our researchers. A case in point is announcing a medical finding by saying that it disproves CCSVI as the sole cause of MS. Because it's not the sole cause we can close the books on this CCSVI hysteria and all these false reports of improvements. No need for clinical trials. No nachos for Zamboni. After all they have at last found a cure for MS - selective abortion.

I'm sure glad I was lucky enough to get CCSVI treatment when I did. It's the only time I've experienced any kind of lasting victory in my decades long fight against this disease.

They're gonna kill all this CCSVI stuff and throw us all under the genetics bus. Our only viable option now is to continue the innefective drug warfare against our autoimmune systems.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 11:13 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2567
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
That's what pharmasuitables manufacturers would like you to believe. And the Harperites have successfully taken things out of the hands of activists and placed them in the slow-moving federal government arena where changes take generations, and must survive the best efforts, of provincial and federal politicians, bureaucrats, and hundreds of thousands of linear feet of stacks of rulebooks, to kill them. Not to mention peer review, trial timelines, etc.

"God bless the child that's got his own." - Billie Holliday, Arthur Herzog Jr.

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 11:31 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8511
1eye wrote:
I was going to ask, why do we have to put up with topic titles that are so bellicose, volatile, inflammatory, deliberately misleading, even? But I realized that the people who matter and get read in this forum are provoked to argue, and end up interacting with each other, so the whole thing has some sort of built-in governance, that depends on everyone's good natures. I suppose that is one case where the medium is part of the message, or something.

Everyone in this forum matters and gets read.... ;) (in part because there is no 'hide posts by this user' option). Yeah, it would be nice if the bellicosity could be turned down a notch. "I disagree with you but I'm pretty sure you're not Hitler," to quote a sign from the Daily Show's moderates march on Washington last year.
Quote:
Anyway, I was just thinking, maybe one of the reasons for the high rate of restenosis is leaflets coming back from the dead, and maybe we are in a hurry to just balloon the heck out of whatever is obviously right now getting in the way of the flow, without stepping back and planning a more lasting fix. I don't know. Is anything more lasting going to be tried, or are we happy to just get periodic retreatments?

I think the doctors are trying but it's a hard nut to crack.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Massive study disputes Zamboni theory of multiple sclerosis

mccandless58

9

929

Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:57 pm

MrSuccess View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Test of CCSVI - Multiple Sclerosis theory 'watershed moment'

squiffy2

0

992

Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:31 am

squiffy2 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Translated article: MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: ZAMBONI, AISM TRIAL

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

ThisIsMA

41

3319

Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:42 am

BooBear View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Venous Angioplasty/Multiple Sclerosis: Study

dania

1

701

Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:21 pm

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Twin study surveys genome for cause of multiple sclerosis

fernando

6

1093

Wed May 05, 2010 1:50 am

sbr487 View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: