This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 12:28 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: .
PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:20 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
.


Last edited by Lyon on Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:27 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 1311
Location: Rotorua New Zealand
As Sal says the eyes see what the eyes want to see;
http://www.ms-info.net/evo/msmanu/956.htm#level_5_1
(V-1) The Dynamics of Lesion Formation
The development of the pattern of a lesion depends, in the final analysis, on plain mechanical principles. The first clues for determining the cause of a particular kind of injury are thus to be derived from its outer shape and inner organization. In multiple sclerosis, a sober consideration of the patterns of lesion “dissemination", i.e. of the "fibre-borne" extension of patches in the spinal cord's flanks, and the eccentric expansion of homogenous plaques from definite brain veins, will clarify several significant points:
Which forces are capable of bringing about the particular changes via the structures from which the lesions originate and in the observed directions and ranges of spread?
In which ways are the injurious forces transmitted onto the structures and zones from which the lesions arise?
From which sources do the injurious impulses arise?
Which forces control and check the lesion spread?
An explanation follows of the dynamics of lesion formation, as well as of the physical preconditions, i.e. the structural abnormalities required, for multiple sclerosis-specific changes to evolve. In light of the fundamental differences between cord patch extension and brain plaque expansion, the specific affections of spinal cord and brain will be discussed separately....
Read on it gets better and better.
Regards Nigel


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:17 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
.


Last edited by Lyon on Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:35 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 1311
Location: Rotorua New Zealand
Long ago eyes did not see what was written. It is still overlooked and misunderstood.
Did it get a look in when the research was done in the research listed above, I wonder?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:23 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
.


Last edited by Lyon on Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:36 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: southern California
that was posted in May, Bob- by Cece--when it first came out
and you actually commented on it, but removed said comment....

http://www.thisisms.com/ftopicp-166141- ... der#166141

The big news today is the new review by Zivadinov---
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopict-17676.html
that's a brand new review,
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:03 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 6063
.


Last edited by Lyon on Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:23 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8511
Quote:
Pending further investigations, no therapeutic interventions involving treatment of plausible CCSVI should be recommended for patients with MS outside of controlled clinical settings.

This is a familiar refrain. I am all for controlled clinical settings although I did not want that for myself, at least not if it meant a randomized control trial and a possibility of sham treatment.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: