Cece wrote:
HappyPoet wrote:
UCC is controlling two symptoms and CCSVI controlled three symptoms, but I've restenosed at the six-month mark and anticipate losing my IJVs due to occlusion.

HP, do you know that both IJVs restenosed? Was this by ultrasound? Through ultrasound, the doctor should be able to tell what the restenosis is, namely if intimal hyperplasia or clotting are seen. If you are anticipating occlusion, did the doctor tell you that either of these was present? It is very possible to restenose without the loss of a vein being imminent. Tell me more, I am worried.
Cece, you're priceless! You're so sweet and caring. Your questions really mean a lot, but...
Last week, I received a denial of appeal letter from Medicare (
TEN pages--talk about a bureaucratic waste of money!!) for my June US that I'm required to pay for. I haven't had the six-month US test because I don't know what good an US will do other than cost me
another $500.
Does it really matter right now if my restenosis is a complete occlusion or just a partial blockage of either intimal hyperplasia or clotting given that I have a complete loss of improvements? I think both IJVs have restenosed because my tinnitus is back in both ears, but this is just a guess.
I do understand that knowing what the restenosis is caused by--clotting, intimal hyperplasia, valvular tissue popping out from the vein wall, recoil of the annulus, or scar tissue--will be important when/if I decide to have another procedure, but in the meantime, do I really need to know?
To me, the improvements that venoplasty gave me aren't worth all the costs and risks, both known and unknown, of having another procedure at this time, or at least I've convinced myself of this. At any rate, I'm going to wait until there are more published studies, there are more IRs experienced in getting through occlusions and blockages, and there are more options regarding valve and vein replacement.
I'm one of the luckier unlucky patients in that I have extra-large collaterals and my IJV blockages were 99% and 95% which means that when my IJVs become occluded, if they aren't already, at least I won't get worse than I was before venoplasty. I really feel sorry for the patients who had venoplasty for lesser blockages than mine because my understanding is that when/if their IJVs occlude or become blocked more than their original blockages, the patients will end up worse than they were before venoplasty.
Thanks again for asking, Cece. Hopefully, you know how important you are to all of us.