Jugular wrote:
Based upon what I learned in the other thread

, it would seem that valves with truncular malformations (stuck closed) are associated with CCSVI and MS, whereas valves that are insufficient (stuck open) are associated with TGA.
YES!!!!! YAY! We have a winner....I guess you've shown that I could have said that in less words, huh???
Quote:
I'm still not sure that it is a "pick your poison" dichotomy. Firstly, trying to balloon veins upstream from valvular malformations seems to be at best a temporary fix (clinics focused on valves have markedly lower restenosis rates). Secondly, there have been no reported cases of TGA in the ever growing population of patients having undergone valvular angioplasty.
This type of internet rumor about restenosis rates is what got people going to Bulgaria to get LARGER Balloons....they thought it lead to lower restenosis rates, and now they have NO FLOW. People with valvupasty have just as many restenoses...here's a guy in Las Vegas who went to Arata's clinic NINE times, due to restenosis. He needed a vein transplant--
http://msmikejuices.blogspot.com/search ... results=29I'm just going to throw this out there. What if increasing speed of flow thru the vein by opening the stenotic lesion, like what was done to my husband, relieved what looked like a "stuck" valve? Hydration, blood thinners, the endothelial health program can help keep that blood flowing. What if it is merely that enough flow isn't going thru the vein to keep the valve in an open position when lying down? We do not know how many strokes or TGA experiences have been related to valvuplasty, since there is no follow up. One Canadian did die in Orange County....but we do not know circumstances, because there was no follow up.
Quote:
A few other things to keep in mind. TGA does not seem to cause any lasting damage, patiients who have experienced it once, tend not to again, and (as 1eye) points out, collaterals have no valves. So patients with valvular malformations have the worst of both worlds and patients having undergone valve "opening" have the best of one and an unproven risk of the other (which they had anyway).
That's not true about TGA....you can have repeats, and strokes, as well. It's not a benign thing...
Quote:
28 patients with transient global amnesia (TGA) were followed for a mean period of 73 months. The patients fell into 3 diagnostic groups: a group where patients had associated symptoms and signs of transient focal cerebral ischemia (TIA), a migraine group and a miscellaneous group. 22 patients had evidence of cerebrovascular disease or risk factors for cerebrovascular disease, and a vascular basis for the amnesic attack was highly suggestive in 25 patients. During the follow-up period 2 patients died, 3 had recurrent TGA and 13 developed a completed stroke or suffered from further TIA's. Permanent memory impairment was encountered in 9 cases. An unfavourable course was related to the presence of other TIA manifestations and/or risk factors for cerebrovascular disease. The study indicates that TGA is probably due to transient ischemia in the vertebrobasilar arterial distribution area. TGA per se has a good prognosis, but the coexistence of risk factor or manifest cerebrovascular disease implies a high rate of a subsequent completed stroke or permanent memory impairment.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7211 ... t=AbstractQuote:
Repeated attacks of TGA are not rare and with each attack the likelihood increases of permanent memory deficits and progressive dementia. A rarer outcome is cerebral infarction in the territory of posterior cerebral arteries commonly referred to as "amnesic stroke."
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/5 ... f_ipsecshaCollaterals do not have valves, you are right, but they are squirrly and more circuitous than the jugular veins, which are a straight shot from heart to head. Venous reflux in a collateral will not exert the same venous back pressure into the brain.
Quote:
In my case; I have noticed no ill effect from repeated valsalva maneuvering. Knock on wood.
As I've stated, that's all that matters in your case, Jugular. My husband is fine with stents, as well. But other patients need to go in with all of the peer-reviewed and published research. That's why I stick around

Anecdotal evidence is great, but we need to stick to what's been documented...
and that shows that valves are important.cheer
_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS