Research into controversial MS treatment

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.

Research into controversial MS treatment

Postby MSUK » Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:50 pm

Research into controversial MS treatment still too conflicting, study finds


A new study attempting to evaluate the validity of research into the prevalence of blocked veins in multiple sclerosis patients has concluded the evidence is too conflicting and inconsistent to draw any concrete conclusions.

The study, published Monday in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, adds another layer of uncertainty to the controversy surrounding the contentious issue, which has been brewing for about two years following media reports of the possible link between blocked veins and MS.

“I think it’s really hard to come to any conclusion, any definitive conclusion,” said Andreas Laupacis, lead author of the study and executive director of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto. “We won’t know for a few years the full story.”... [Read More]
User avatar
Family Elder
Posts: 2501
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:00 pm


Repeat Thread

Postby MarkW » Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:28 am

This thread is a repeat of Cece's post:

I still think:
Ask a researcher to answer the CCSVI and MS question - the answer is 'more data is needed'.
Ask a business analyst the same question - the answer is 'I recommend diagnosis and treatment for CCSVI syndrome ......'

Suggest we use Cece thread as it was started first.

Mark Walker - Oxfordshire, England. Retired Pharmacist. 12 years of study around MS.
Mark's CCSVI Report 7-Mar-11:
User avatar
Family Elder
Posts: 1152
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:00 pm
Location: Oxfordshire, England

Return to Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)


  • Related topics
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Contact us | Terms of Service