This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 4:40 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:40 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: southern California
An independent study at the University of Milan, utilizing Zamboni doppler protocol--
published in ACTA Phlebology
http://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals ... 11N02A0109


Quote:
Venous extracranial Duplex ultrasound and possible correlations between multiple sclerosis and CCSVI: an observational study after 560 exams
P. M. BAVERA 1, L. MENDOZZI 2, R. CAVARRETTA 2, G. B. AGUS 3

The article concerns an observational study subsequent to 560 Duplex ultrasound (DU) exams on multiple sclerosis affected patients. The aim of the study was to find out, after the so-called “Zamboni Theory”, if there may be any correlations between chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) and Multiple Sclerosis (MS). All the patients had a certain diagnosis for MS and all exams were carried out, with a group of control in non-MS patients, by the same operator using two similar but different brand Duplex devices following the same procedure. The aim was to find any possible malformation in the extracranial venous cerebral outflow, mainly concerning the internal jugular vein and vertebral plexus system. Outflow malformations due to significantly reduced vein diameter and/or valve flaps were seeked both in horizontal and upright position. The results were interesting considering the constant presence of venous outflow problems in a significant number of patients affected by SM disease. The diagnosis percentage happened to be very similar, and significant, using either DU devices

Abnormalities regarding blood flow and morphology together with the chromatic aspects were present in 88% of the examined patients (493 patients). The exams were all carried out by the same operator using two different DU machines, revealing almost identical abnormality percentages (387 with the GE and 106 with the Esaote). This confirms that when inside instrument equality for probes and settings, the exam is mainly operator dependant and not vice versa.

The premises that revealed to be mostly interested (among the 493 patients positive for two or more pa- rameters) by stenosis and/or valve abnormalities are here shown in Table I.

Table I.—Site and type of abnormalities.
– Abnormal valves at the junction between jugular veins with the brachio cephalic vein in 333 cases (67.5%) of which 274 bilat- eral and 59 monolateral.
– Reflux of the internal jugular vein in 258 patients (52.3%).
– Reflux of the vertebral plexus in 266 patients (54%)
– Stenosis of internal jugular veins in 431 patients (87.5%) with vein calliper reduction over 70% of the normal lumen.
– High frequency blood flow turbulence and chromatic changes that appear to he “hemodynamically significant” in correspond- ence with the stenosis and /or valve abnormalities.
– Cross section negative difference of the jugular transverse area in the supine/upright position in 212 patients (43%).
– Complete occlusion or agenesia of one internal jugular vein in 10 patients (2.1%).

Within the group of examined positive patients, considering that VHISS parameters were at least 2/5 in 451 (91.5%) patients and 3/5 in 42 (8.5%), a certain correlation between SM and CCSVI appears rather evident.

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 3:31 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8505
Great results.
They mention a control group but no mention of it being a blinded control group, so it is possible the operator knew which patients had MS and which did not.
560 is a very high number of exams.

It's hardly a difference but the exact percentage is 88%, not 91.5%, if I'm reading this right.
Quote:
Abnormalities regarding blood flow and morphology together with the chromatic aspects were present in 88% of the examined patients (493 patients).

The 91.5% figure comes from looking only at those 88% patients who tested positive, to see if they had 2/5 or 3/5 "VHISS" parameters (Are they using VHISS to mean Zamboni criteria?)
Quote:
Within the group of examined positive patients, considering that VHISS parameters were at least 2/5 in 451 (91.5%) patients and 3/5 in 42 (8.5%), a certain correlation between SM and CCSVI appears rather evident.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. New Study-710 pwMS, 86% have CCSVI

cheerleader

0

652

Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:08 pm

cheerleader View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. new Serbian study finds CCSVI by ultrasound in pwMS

Cece

1

288

Wed May 16, 2012 1:22 pm

1eye View the latest post

This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. BNAC study shows CCSVI not in all MSer's or cause

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

eric593

70

5672

Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:19 am

scorpion View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. ECTRIMS Cleveland Autopsy Study-jugular VMs in pwMS

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

cheerleader

51

3177

Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:33 pm

Cece View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Any PWMS would consider JUST having CCSVI and no RX?

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

CuriousRobot

27

1375

Sun Oct 02, 2011 1:44 pm

Thekla View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: emess2


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: