This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 4:34 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:00 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 43
I had the procedure done in Chicago in March and was denied coverage from my insurance company. I was wondering if someone out there had there procedure covered by insurance and if the doctors office filed the claim. My procedure was filed by AAC. I would think they would know how to work the insurance company to get it covered, but that was not the case. I am worried that if I have to go for another procedure where the money will come from. Any help is appreciated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:32 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8511
Do you know how to go about doing an appeal? I think it's worth trying. Was your insurance BCBS?

My insurance was filed by AAC in Brooklyn in July, and it went through without any issue.

Are your worries about another procedure more future-based or do you feel like you may have restenosed?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 6:40 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 43
I have insurance with my employer. I am just thinking into the future. I would hope that I would not have to deal with re-stenosing anytime soon. It would be nice if this was widely accepted by all insurance companies, that is what we pay the premiums for, so I thought.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 5:57 am 
Offline
Volunteer Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 2717
anamishguy wrote:
I have insurance with my employer. I am just thinking into the future. I would hope that I would not have to deal with re-stenosing anytime soon. It would be nice if this was widely accepted by all insurance companies, that is what we pay the premiums for, so I thought.


When I was diagnosed, I spent 2 nights in the hospital. This stay was preapproved with my insurance company by my doctor's office otherwise it never would have happened. In spite of the preapproval, the insurance company still tried to deny coverage for the hospital stay after the fact. I took their denial letter back to my doctor's office and they took care of the issue with the insurance company. It was perhaps fortunate that I had the weight of a university medical system standing with me against the insurance company.

NHE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:53 pm 
Offline
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 1
I had a veinogram and angioplasty done at Albany Medical center in October 2010 for CCSVI.
My insurance refused to pay because they said it was not an approved treatment for MS.

I did a written appeal and stated;
I AGREE IT IS NOT AN APPROVED TREATMENT FOR MS.
SHOW ME WHERE IN MY POLICY DOES IT STATE THAT IF YOU HAVE MS, THE POLICY DOES NOT COVER A STANDARD VEINOGRAM AND ANGIOPLASTY TO RESTORE NORMAL BLOOD FLOW FROM MY BRAIN TO MY HEART.

They then agreed to pay.

JERRY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:51 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8511
That is excellent! I haven't heard of many people appealing and winning. I know people who aren't getting the procedure because their particular insurance isn't covering it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:17 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2568
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
This refusal is part of the pattern we have come to be acutely aware of. People who want to prove that something about themselves is important, by using the "MS" patient as a convenient way of flexing their bureaucratic muscles. Insurance companies who find the pigeonhole to be convenient and temporarily profitable as well. "MS" is used as an excuse for all kinds of questionable behaviour. I think many still believe in eugenics. In the early nineteen-sixties, forced sterilization was practiced on people assessed as "morons", by others who had power over them. Even today, universal health care, one of the benefits given most Canadians, is only available if you are a submissive and cooperating patient.

I can understand those who make cranky or annoying people wait longer, say, for emergency-room treatment. They have to limit scarce resources, and it sometimes insulates them from abuse. The discrimination against pw"MS", in contrast, is a reflex reaction, because there is a 150-year record of treatment failure, and because the victims, being dead, are never in a position to argue. Even supreme court judges get into it. Some, I believe, think that the only good solution is birth control. Like some rock song said when I was in high school: "What you gonna do about me?" Too late for abortion or sterilization, by a few decades. Wait it out, if you are in government, or a competing drug vendor. Sometimes I think this must all be just a bad dream, but then I remember.

The bottom line is, bad drainage will make you sick, anywhere in your body, whether you have "MS" or not. It is discrimination.

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:55 pm 
Online
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 1240
Location: south western pa.
very well stated rockybear!! too many times and too many ways they use the old excuse that because a person has ms they should not be getting certain medical procedures done. hopefully the air will get cleared soon. this bull that they pull is exactly what it is--bullshit!!

you did good-real good!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:21 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 465
Has anyone had any recent experience with Medicare coverage? Last time I checked, they were denying coverage because it is an "experimental" procedure for MS.

Donnchadh

_________________
Kitty says, "Take that, you stenosis!"

Got MS?.....Get Liberated!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:31 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8511
I know someone who had the procedure done very recently and it's been submitted to Medicare. Would love to see it go through.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Insurance for CCSVI

Yasmeen

0

656

Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:01 am

Yasmeen View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Does insurance cover CCSVI treatment at all?

ksue1214

7

472

Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:04 pm

ksue1214 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Private MRI

maryfsj

4

1214

Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:09 pm

BCSailor View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. PRIVATE MESSAGE

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

dania

20

1762

Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:10 am

euphoniaa View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Surgery for MS available at private clinic in UK

squiffy2

1

934

Sat Oct 02, 2010 4:50 am

Luvsadonut View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blossom


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: