This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 6:43 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:22 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8505
Here's a statement by Dr. Arata over on facebook:
Quote:
Despite the apparent anecdotal basis of the FDA warning cannot be dismissed. If you consider having or performing the CCSVI procedure safety must be the primary concern. The literature demonstrated that pre-procedure imaging improves the safety and reduces the duration of many procedures. MRV is unparalleled in is ability to provide a venous roadmap before a CCSVI procedure. High quality imaging also contributes to safety during the procedure. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides the most detailed intra-procedure images.

We are of the opinion that if the CCSVI procedure is going to be performed with maximal safety in mind the treating physician must know the anatomy beforehand. This is best accomplished with an MRV. In an effort to ensure utmost patient safety all patients undergoing the CCSVI procedure at Synergy will have a pre-procedure MRV and have intra-procedure IVUS.

The claim is that preprocedure imaging provides a roadmap and improves safety. The preprocedure imaging of an MRV comes at a cost to the patient of about $2000. The doctor states that preprocedure imaging improves safety in other diseases. I wonder if these other diseases are venous diseases, and if the proprocedure imaging of choice is an MRV? Does a person getting treated for Budd Chairi or Superior Vena Cava syndrome get an MRV first? Even if they do, is it for diagnostic purposes or is it for information to use during the procedure?

MarkW, you can add Synergy to the list now of doctors using IVUS in every procedure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 6:20 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: southern California
I'm sure the answer to your question depends on who you ask, Cece...but for many, the answer is yes.

Quote:
Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) has emerged as an effective imaging tool for the evaluation of diseases of the veins of the abdomen, pelvis, thorax, and extremities. Although duplex sonography is often the first modality for the evaluation of the venous system, it is hindered by acoustic access, especially in the evaluation of the deep veins of the pelvis, thorax, and the calf. MRV plays an important clinical role in the evaluation of venous disease, and in some clinical instances, such as evaluation of the pelvic veins, it has become the test of choice. Advances in local coils, gradient systems, and other system hardware and software have enabled faster scanning, reduced artifacts, increased signal-to-noise, and reduced examination times. Comprehensive examinations of the entire venous system can be performed in < 30 minutes. The clinical applications of MRV include diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis, for which MRV is the “new gold standard,” evaluation of chest and upper extremity veins for venous access, differentiating bland from tumor thrombus, diagnosis of superior vena caval syndrome, identification of superior vena caval invasion or encasement by lung or mediastinal tumors, diagnosis of the Budd-Chiari syndrome, diagnosis of caval anomalies such as persistent left superior vena cava and interrupted inferior vena cava, and identification of the presence and cause of obstruction or occlusion of the brachiocephalic, subclavian, and jugular veins.

http://www.med.nyu.edu/mri/vascular/app ... raphy.html

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 7:32 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8505
Here a discussion of pelvic congestion syndrome refers to the MRV as roadmap:
http://www.conferencematters.co.nz/pdf/ ... estion.pdf
and another mention of MRV as roadmap:
http://www.bushvenouslectures.com/blog/ ... sp?id=2573
Quote:
Dr. McLafferty shared many images such as May Thurner Syndrome, right internal jugular vein stenosis, etc…
[...]Why should you do a CTV/MRV prior to direct venography?
Pre-intervention ‘Road map’
Thorough evaluation
Guide approach to access
Guide therapy plan
Duplex may fail (Abdomen/pelvis) (Wounds, obesity, edema)

Diagnosing venous malformations
Can diagnose/quantify compression syndromes
Degree of compression
Cause of compression
Extent of thrombus
Identify other pathology
Your finding may change next treatment step

Interesting about the use of MRV to diagnose compressions.
The MRV may be useful but is it $2000 out-of-pocket useful if intravascular ultrasound and venogram are going to be used as part of the procedure anyway.
Of course I am still shocked at the price our Canadian friends are paying for travel and procedure, and sometimes multiple procedures.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Standard Letter

sweetpea

5

1327

Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:07 pm

ClaireParry View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Why Ultrasound and not MRV should be standard

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

Cece

30

2691

Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:22 pm

drsclafani View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Double standard for MS patients: doctors

erinc14

0

830

Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:46 am

erinc14 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Standard CCSVI Form Letter to send to MPs

squiffy2

2

971

Fri Feb 05, 2010 2:01 pm

ClaireParry View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. GOLD STANDARD TOOLS for diagnosis at 8 Clinics, any more?

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1 ... 6, 7, 8 ]

MarkW

117

7922

Sat Mar 23, 2013 7:15 am

drsclafani View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: