This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 1:29 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: equipoise
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:56 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8506
Always good to learn a new word, especially one that supports the need to see CCSVI research done.

Quote:
We thank Dr Reekers for his comments. We recognize and respect that differing views regarding the ethical permissibility of clinical research in CCSVI exist. As we stated, a strong scientific case has been made against CCSVI as a causative factor in multiple sclerosis, and we shared our doubt regarding its validity. Nonetheless, published clinical research suggests that endovascular intervention may be effective in at least a portion of involved patients. Therefore, we argue that a vital prerequisite for research to be conducted (ie, equipoise) exists. Equipoise in this instance is not an individual's sense of ambivalence regarding the efficacy of a novel treatment, but rather the existence of uncertainty within the scientific community regarding its efficacy compared with existing therapies or placebo.

http://archneur.jamanetwork.com/article ... id=1214757

CCSVI should be researched because equipoise exists.

Quote:
Clinical equipoise, also known as the principle of equipoise, provides the ethical basis for medical research that involves assigning patients to different treatment arms of a clinical trial. The term was first used by Benjamin Freedman in 1987.
Quote:
In short, clinical equipoise means that there is genuine uncertainty in the expert medical community over whether a treatment will be beneficial. This applies also for off-label treatments performed before or during their required clinical trials.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinical_equipoise


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: equipoise
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:27 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 575
Location: Surrey, UK
Splendid, thanks to Cece I am more intelligent this evening to the tune of one word.

I'll be looking for an opportunity to use it as soon as possible.

Keep up the good work!

We used to have a TV word game in the UK called "Call My Bluff" where the panelists would give three differing meanings of an obscure word each in an attempt to convince another team they were the correct definition. The job of the opposing team was to pick the correct one.

Equipoise would be absolutely perfect for Call my Bluff.

As you can see we really know how to live it up in the UK!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: equipoise
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:09 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8506
I would never have guessed the meaning of equipoise from the sound of the word itself. Equivalent and equine and poise would lead me astray. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: equipoise
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:59 am 
Offline
Volunteer Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 2711
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Equipoise

e·qui·poise
n.
1. Equality in distribution, as of weight, relationship, or emotional forces; equilibrium.
2. A counterpoise; a counterbalance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: equipoise
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:35 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 2564
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
Well coming from a place concerned more about money than patients, it's a bottom-line kind of word. It has been used lately in discussions of the work of John Nash, who was a games theorist who won the Nobel for Economics. It is also used lately as the latest economics fad, and a couple of other Nobels have been won. See this reference.

Movie about Nash.

_________________
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: equipoise
PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:19 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 8506
Interesting, 1eye, I missed that comment earlier.

I ran across 'equipoise' again. It might be relevant. ASTRAL was a renal artery stenting large randomized controlled trial.
Quote:
ASTRAL has been criticized on a few fronts. First, the trial design is based on the “principle of equipoise”. Essentially, the investigators only enrolled patients in whom they were uncertain as to whether they would derive clinical benefit from revascularization. As such, many patients enrolled in the trial had lesions of dubious clinical significance, as more high-risk patients would not have been randomized. As an example, 40% of those enrolled had less than 70% stenosis, and some patients with stenoses as low as 60% were included.

http://renalfellow.blogspot.com/2009/11 ... trial.html
In any CCSVI trial, this might be relevant for patient selection.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AndrewKFletcher


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: