blossom wrote:
i asked him- aren't you at least curious.
Blossom, nice post and probably the same conversation that goes on hundreds of times a day around the globe.
The quote above is what sticks in my mind.
I asked Emma's Neuro - forget about everything you know about MS (Which isn't a lot right!)
Why did a medical angioplasty procedure opening veins in Emma provide instant eyesight improvements, on the table and indeed a change of prescription? I would just like to understand that medically. He said "Placebo - she though she could see better!"
I then explained the TMJ treatment Emma had - that she'd developed such a painful jaw that she was living on a soup diet - we saw a TMJ specialist who with braces corrected the jaw problem but a side effect was it eradicated debilitating Neuralgia and substantially reduced fatigue - two of Emma's symptoms that had been attributed to MS.
I asked are you not interested in why this happened?
That's what I don't understand - a patient provides a medical specialist with details of a treatment that has helped them and they don't seem to show the slightest hint of an interest as it doesn't fit their model for the condition. I really just can't get my head around that.