ALBANY RESEARCHERS CANCEL MS CLINICAL TRIAL

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.

Re: ALBANY RESEARCHERS CANCEL MS CLINICAL TRIAL

Postby pairOdime » Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:36 am

Randomized Trial of Immediate versus Delayed Transluminal Percutaneous Angioplasty to treat Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency

Would interested participants consider enrollment if there was the possibility of a 6 month delay in their treatment for CCSVI?

All participants would receive treatment and all symptoms tracked pre- & post-procedure at 1 month intervals for 1 year. This seems more reasonable from a vascular perspective, but this is not a drug trial design. I don’t believe the treatment of TOS via PTA would have a sham treatment arm. Of course, this has been discussed at length many times. The delayed treatment interval could be reduced to 3 months.
It's a paradigm shift
pairOdime
Family Elder
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:00 pm

Advertisement

Re: ALBANY RESEARCHERS CANCEL MS CLINICAL TRIAL

Postby 1eye » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:47 am

NO, Dr. Siskin. Now is not the time to lower your scientific standards. If you say, it's OK, it's time to retire from this, you are giving up, and the Forces of Ignorance have won. The only way to win is to play, on a level field. The rules are strict, but you are setting yourself up to fail if you just pack up and go home when you have a setback. That is what the Fool and Dunce Admiseration are handing you, and you must fend off these minor blows. Sham procedures, randomization etc., are why you get the big bucks to do research. They are not rocket science either. The trial is ready to go. It just needs a few brave American women and men to step up. I know they will. Let them. I am willing to put some of my few dollars into it, and I bet there are plenty of others of the same mind.

I gave $100 or $200, once only, to McMaster for Dr. Haake's research, and I expect to receive begging letters and phone calls for the rest of my life. If they can do it, so can you. Appeal to existing patients and previous ones. Appeal to the caregivers of MS/CCSVI patients, too.

The more people that get put down without any response, the harder it will be for the next one to carry the torch when you do want to pass it. CCSVI is winning this race, except where interference from drug vendors and lobbyists is allowed to prevail.

Listening to the Saskatoon papers (or the FDA) about heavy scientific or ethical matters is like listening to your cat tell you what you should have for dinner, or how to drive your car.

If you do revisit the design of your trial, you might want to include the use of IVUS.
"Try - Just A Little Bit Harder" - Janis Joplin
CCSVI procedure Albany Aug 2010
'MS' is over - if you want it
Patients sans/without patience
User avatar
1eye
Family Elder
 
Posts: 2852
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada

Re: ALBANY RESEARCHERS CANCEL MS CLINICAL TRIAL

Postby erinc14 » Sat Sep 14, 2013 7:34 am

Sask. MS patient wants liberation therapy answers after trial cancelled

Read more: http://regina.ctvnews.ca/sask-ms-patien ... z2esSWDB16
User avatar
erinc14
Family Elder
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:00 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: ALBANY RESEARCHERS CANCEL MS CLINICAL TRIAL

Postby drsclafani » Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:42 pm

pairOdime wrote:Randomized Trial of Immediate versus Delayed Transluminal Percutaneous Angioplasty to treat Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency

Would interested participants consider enrollment if there was the possibility of a 6 month delay in their treatment for CCSVI?

All participants would receive treatment and all symptoms tracked pre- & post-procedure at 1 month intervals for 1 year. This seems more reasonable from a vascular perspective, but this is not a drug trial design. I don’t believe the treatment of TOS via PTA would have a sham treatment arm. Of course, this has been discussed at length many times. The delayed treatment interval could be reduced to 3 months.


there are patients who have delayed onset of some improvements up to one year after treatment. While they had improvements in the early term, other improvements did not show until 11 months or later.

DrS
Salvatore JA Sclafani MD
Patient contact: ccsviliberation@gmail.com
User avatar
drsclafani
Family Elder
 
Posts: 3101
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: Brooklyn, New York

Previous

Return to Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users