Absorbable stents are worse for heart patients

A forum to discuss Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency and its relationship to Multiple Sclerosis.

Absorbable stents are worse for heart patients

Postby NHE » Fri Mar 31, 2017 9:54 pm

Absorbable Stent Is Worse, Not Better, for Preventing Heart Attacks

https://www.peoplespharmacy.com/2017/03 ... t-attacks/

Two years of evidence show that the new absorbable stent is linked to more heart attacks rather than fewer compared to conventional stents.

When people have serious heart disease and require balloon angioplasty, interventional cardiologists frequently insert a stent. This tiny mesh cylinder fits inside a blood vessel to keep it open. It sits there ever after, but sometimes there are adverse effects. How well does an absorbable stent do?

Problems with Stents:

Prior to stents, arteries would often clog again after angioplasty. Early stents were made of bare metal. But sometimes such stents can cause cellular overgrowth that leads to blockage within a year or less.

Drug-eluting stents became popular because the immune-suppressing medication that they give off helps reduce scarring and overgrowth. But these frequently require patients to take anti-clotting medications for long periods of time.

What Is an Absorbable Stent?

A new technology introduced in 2016 relies on a polymer scaffold that can be absorbed into the blood vessel wall. Cardiologists hoped that the absorbable stent would be as effective as metal stents but safer.

Sadly, a new report comparing the absorbable stent to a drug-eluting stent found that after two years there were significantly more cardiac complications among patients who received the Absorb stent. Almost eleven percent had experienced heart attacks, a need for repeat procedure or heart-related death. In comparison, about 8 percent of those who got the more conventional stent suffered such problems. Most of the difference was due to more heart attacks among patients with absorbable stents.

American College of Cardiology, Washington, DC. March, 2017


Although this is interesting, it says nothing about the potential use of absorbable stents in CCSVI.
User avatar
NHE
Volunteer Moderator
 
Posts: 4530
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 3:00 pm

Advertisement

Re: Absorbable stents are worse for heart patients

Postby Cece » Mon Apr 03, 2017 5:53 am

Why more heart attacks in people with absorbable stents? If the stents were more likely to clog or induce clots that broke loose, that could make absorbable stents less useful in CCSVI. A clot coming loose from the jugulars can end up in the lungs.
Cece
Family Elder
 
Posts: 9284
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:00 pm


Return to Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI)

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


Contact us | Terms of Service