This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 9:48 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Simka's latest!!
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:13 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2066
Location: USA
Quote:

Preliminary report on pathologic flow patterns in the internal jugular and vertebral veins of patients with multiple sclerosis
Marian Simka, Jacek Kostecki, Maciej Zaniewski, Eugeniusz Majewski, Danuta Szewczyk-Urgacz
Phlebological Review 2009; 17(2):61-64
ICID: 887336
Article type: Original article
IC™ Value: 3.00

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neurologic disease of undetermined background. Recent discoveries suggest that this disease could be a venous pathology. The study has been done to assess veins in the neck in multiple sclerosis patients, in order to confirm findings by researches from Ferrara. There were examined 8 patients with proven diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. They were performed color Doppler examination of their internal jugular veins and vertebral veins. Abnormalities were found in all patients, but no universal anatomical pattern of venous pathology existed. There were found: occlusion of one internal jugular vein - 2 patients, stenosis of one internal jugular vein - 4 patients, stenosis of both internal jugular veins - 2 patients, stiff but not yet narrowed internal jugular vein - 1 patient, reflux in internal jugular vein – 2 patients, stenosis of vertebral veins - 3 patients, reflux in vertebral veins - 1 patient. Although further studies are needed to establish the actual role for pathology of extracranial veins in the etiopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis, these investigations can open a new chapter in management of this debilitating neurologic disease.

ICID 887336



now available HERE

This is also added to the replicating studies thread...

Cheer posted an abstract of an earlier version of this paper some time ago but this is the official published version....hot off the press. The final version lost the reference to the 3 cases of probable MS who also showed this when tested and I have asked why, will post that response when we know... but it is very common for editors to as for revised papers so they may be responsible for that
marie

_________________
I'm not offering medical advice, I am just a patient too! Talk to your doctor about what is best for you...
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopic-7318-0.html This is my regimen thread
http://www.ccsvibook.com Read my book published by McFarland Health topics


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:53 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 1419
Location: California
I might be because maybe the probable MSers could look like controls as they have not been totally diagnosed yet. So people might question the 100% finding. (just my thoughts)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:13 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2066
Location: USA
LR My thought was similar like only include them once you know the final diagnosis result so they are NOT possibly "non MSers".

Bottom line though neurological problems to the point of probable MS and then a positive doppler findings in the light of Zamboni's findings is pretty remarkable. If all were eventually dix'd with MS it is important, maybe it'll be a separate paper down the road with fllow ups...

_________________
I'm not offering medical advice, I am just a patient too! Talk to your doctor about what is best for you...
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopic-7318-0.html This is my regimen thread
http://www.ccsvibook.com Read my book published by McFarland Health topics


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: hi marie
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:28 am 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 73
so am i one of those 8 / which 1 / i wonder / the latest is they are recruiting 1100 people some w-ms and others not 2 compare /m STAY STRONG ALL ---P S --THE JOG 4 THE JAKE which is the big fundraisor on fathers day i will sniff around [ in the post race beer tent ] all the big shots will be there :?: :?: :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:27 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 2197
Location: Dayton, Ohio USA
Is that Jacob's field in Cleveland?

_________________
http://myhopefuljourneyintoactualmsreco ... ogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:05 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 1228
Location: Colorado
It would be interesting to know why they were considered probable MS'rs -i.e. lesions, neurological testing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:18 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 73
it s the jacobs neurological institute in buffalo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:59 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2066
Location: USA
The answer on the three probable MSers was that the data set was too small to be useful for significance, so it was elimated.
Quote:
The final version lost the reference to the 3 cases of probable MS who also showed this when tested and I have asked why, will post that response when we know

_________________
I'm not offering medical advice, I am just a patient too! Talk to your doctor about what is best for you...
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopic-7318-0.html This is my regimen thread
http://www.ccsvibook.com Read my book published by McFarland Health topics


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:13 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4676
Location: southern California
Thanks for posting, Marie.
I like the fact that Dr. Simka refers to it as abnormalities of the extracranial veins. This opens up the doppler scanning process of CCSVI to consider how reflux in all of the surrounding veins can signal a problem.

Dr. Simka needs to test more "probable MS" patients and controls and get a larger sample for another paper. This is a very important connection to the beginnings of MS.
Thanks for all your time and effort Dr. Simka!!!
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. latest BNAC research

Cece

7

415

Wed May 16, 2012 9:29 am

tiltawhirl View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. wheelchair kamikaze's latest posts

Cece

9

576

Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:45 am

coach View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Full Version Of Dr Zamboni's latest paper

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

squiffy2

19

4024

Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:49 am

Arcee View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Latest Wheelchair Kamikaze Post on CCSVI

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

marcstck

61

6320

Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:54 am

marcstck View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CCSVI Science – The Latest Results and their Relevance

Direct-MS

1

1036

Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:26 pm

cah View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: