This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:14 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:20 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4695
Location: southern California
a terrific article in the NY Times today. Specifically deals with cancer research, and why doctors who think "outside the box" are not funded-


Quote:
“Scientists don’t like talking about it publicly,” because they worry that their remarks will be viewed as lashing out at the health institutes, which supports them, said Dr. Richard D. Klausner, a former director of the National Cancer Institute.
But, Dr. Klausner added: “There is no conversation that I have ever had about the grant system that doesn’t have an incredible sense of consensus that it is not working. That is a terrible wasted opportunity for the scientists, patients, the nation and the world.”

A Big Idea Without a Backer
For 25 years, Eileen K. Jaffe received federal grants to run her lab. As a senior scientist at the Fox Chase Cancer Center, with a long list of published papers in prestigious journals, she is a respected, established researcher.

Then Dr. Jaffe stumbled upon results that went against textbook explanations, suggesting that it might be possible to find an entirely new class of drugs that could disable proteins that fuel cancer cells. Now she wants to find chemicals that might be developed into such drugs.

But her grant proposal was rejected out of hand by the institutes of health, not even discussed by a review panel. She had no preliminary data showing that the idea was likely to work, something reviewers always want to see, and the idea was just too unprecedented.

Dr. Jaffe epitomizes the scientist who realizes that if she were to single-mindedly pursue her unorthodox idea, her “career may be ruined in the process,” in the words of Dr. Brawley of the American Cancer Society.

Dr. Jaffe is just conceiving her project; it is much to soon to know whether it will result in a revolutionary drug. And even if she does find potential new drugs, it is not clear that they will be effective. Most new ideas are difficult to prove, and most potential new drugs fail.

So Dr. Jaffe was not entirely surprised when her grant application to look for such cancer drugs was summarily rejected.

“They said I don’t have preliminary results,” she said. “Of course I don’t. I need the grant money to get them.”
Dr. Young, chancellor at Fox Chase, said Dr. Jaffe’s situation showed why people with bold new ideas often just give up.
“You can’t prove it will work in advance,” he said. “If you could, it wouldn’t be a high-risk idea.”

It is a long haul, Dr. Jaffe knows. And she has already had to downsize her lab. But, she said, she will persist.

link

With CCSVI, we have a model that is proven in vivo. Preliminary data is in and further data will be presented in September. Thank goodness Dr. Zamboni has private funding thru the Hilarescere Foundation. Not sure how Jacobs is funding their study. I'm currently looking for big donors for Dake at Stanford. Anyone have connections? PM me-
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:26 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 1228
Location: Colorado
Cheer - I think there was something posted that said the Hilarescere Foundation was helping to fund the Jacobs study. I will search.

BTW - great article. When you read something like this, it scares me.

Sharon


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Canadians (and others) Lets push our medical system!!!

Brightspot

7

1407

Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:52 pm

iggy View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. But Doc, I still can't play the piano.

CaptBoo

13

2345

Sat Oct 30, 2010 12:11 am

elyse_peace View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Medical Mischief 3: Ghost Written Medical Journal Articles

Direct-MS

0

849

Fri Oct 01, 2010 4:27 pm

Direct-MS View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Theory “CCSVI leads to the term ‘MS’”

NZer1

9

1758

Fri May 14, 2010 1:24 pm

NZer1 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. medical tourism?, or medical arbitrage?

Johnson

3

1131

Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:14 am

Johnson View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
Read hundreds of personal Multiple Sclerosis stories on Experience Project. Experience Project is an anonymous community where people connect through their life experiences, made by the same people who built This is MS. With over 30 million personal stories about every possible life experience, you can quickly find people like you!


Interesting: Secret Confessions | Dream Meanings | Ask Questions, Get Answers

Advertise on the premier multiple sclerosis forum