This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 1:42 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:29 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 902
Thanks for checking in before you go, and I look forward to the NIH opinion. Good Luck.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:35 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 2692
Location: Sydney, Australia
prof8 wrote:
Did you get a sense of why the radiologist in NY would not recommend stents be placed that high up in the jugulars?
I do not know if it is related, however, in the preliminary results paper from Zamboni (http://www.fondazionehilarescere.org/pdf/CX.PDF) there is the following section:
Zamboni wrote:
However, no attempt at a stenting procedure was made in the absence of a dedicated device capable of preventing migration. This device would fit the particular morphology of the intemal jugular vein, similar to a upside down milk bottle, and, finally avoid protrusion into the brachiocephalic trunk.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:08 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2066
Location: USA
The brachiocephalic is at the bottom end of the jugular vein, not high, so that is probably not the reason considering it had something to do with the "high" location.

_________________
I'm not offering medical advice, I am just a patient too! Talk to your doctor about what is best for you...
http://www.thisisms.com/ftopic-7318-0.html This is my regimen thread
http://www.ccsvibook.com Read my book published by McFarland Health topics


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 4:07 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 326
:?: Bump :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:18 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 2197
Location: Dayton, Ohio USA
Best of luck Marc!!

_________________
http://myhopefuljourneyintoactualmsreco ... ogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:44 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 326
Hope it's not rude to bump again, but I'd REALLY like to hear what the NIH has to say about all this, as my Dec 7th scan with Dr Dake comes closer ...

:?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:18 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4680
Location: southern California
zap wrote:
Hope it's not rude to bump again, but I'd REALLY like to hear what the NIH has to say about all this, as my Dec 7th scan with Dr Dake comes closer ...

:?:


Hey Zap..it's not rude, we're all curious. Marc's just had his second cataract surgery, after another trip down to NIH, and is taking some time away from the computer to heal. Read his blog:
http://www.wheelchairkamikaze.com/
As always, he is an articulate and thoughtful man- I hope we get the report from him in the near future.
cheer

_________________
Husband dx RRMS 3/07
dx dual jugular vein stenosis (CCSVI) 4/09
dual stents placed 5/09
CCSVI in MS


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. If you have received a CCSVI diagnosis....

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

cheerleader

17

4677

Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:26 am

AndrewKFletcher View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Second opinion

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

mrhodes40

26

5095

Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:47 pm

countrychick View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. What is your opinion?

David1949

7

1314

Thu Sep 16, 2010 10:51 am

lucky125 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Opinion of Daflon 500?

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

David1949

19

2494

Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:12 am

CureOrBust View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. very weird but what's your opinion

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

erinc14

15

755

Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:54 am

erinc14 View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: