This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 6:49 am


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:54 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 75
Location: Maine
nomorems wrote:
Does anyone know how to get involved in the Clinical Trials at Stanford. I read somewhere that the cost is $80,000. Is that true?


This is not really a clinical trial, per se, but a doctor breaking new ground without really waiting for a real clinical trial.

They have had significant success getting insurance companies to reimburse for the procedures so far.

Call Dr. Dake's assistant Alex at: (650) 725-3806

But, I wonder, given the complications that one patient just had, whether they are taking any new patients right now. Does anyone know this?

_________________
Mitch
Please visit my blog at www.enjoyingtheride.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:03 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 4:00 pm
Posts: 1228
Location: Colorado
Enjoying the Ride

Agenesis of the lumbar plexus: the lumbar plexus was never formed prior to birth- it is a congenital malformation.

As Marie stated, if it was not there to begin with, there was nothing to balloon


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:24 pm 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 1161
123


Last edited by chrishasms on Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:38 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:00 pm
Posts: 189
Here is what I got out of the article regarding PPMS, PSMS, and RRMS (see below)--according to this things may not have really improved for PPMS and PSMS but my question is: did the progression at least stop? Does Zamboni ever answer this? There is a difference in actual improvement of symptoms (icing on the cake as some people have called it) and stopping the progression outright (what everyone is looking for at the very least).

Neurologic outcome. Outcomes for disease severity, relapse in RR patients, MRI outcome measures, and QOL
were evaluated:
● Disease severity: In RR patients, the MSFC showed
highly significant improvement at 18 months (P 
.008; Table IV). MSFC showed significant although
limited improvement after the first 6 months in both
PP and in SP clinical courses, but at 18 months showed
no improvement respect to baseline (Table V).

● MRI outcome measure: The rate of patients with
active gadolinium-enhanced lesions at MRI decreased
significantly from 50% to 12% (P  .0001; Table IV.
● QOL: In RR patients, mental and physical QOL improved
significantly (P  .001 and P  .003, respectively;
Table IV). In PP and SP patients, QOL showed
limited mental and physical improvement after the first
6 months but not at 18 months (Table V).
[/img]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:04 pm 
Offline
Family Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 75
Location: Maine
Sharon wrote:
Enjoying the Ride

Agenesis of the lumbar plexus: the lumbar plexus was never formed prior to birth- it is a congenital malformation.

As Marie stated, if it was not there to begin with, there was nothing to balloon


Got it! Thanks.

_________________
Mitch
Please visit my blog at www.enjoyingtheride.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:51 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:00 pm
Posts: 374
Chris- The one thing the chart you posted says though is 'no improvement' noed, but it at least doesn't say 'worsening'. Hopefully it stops progression, thats all I am hoping for, and if I get more....... :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 2:55 am 
Offline
Family Elder

Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 1419
Location: California
Hi Prof, That is exactly the part of the paper that I was most interested in.

With the MS drugs their aim is to stop the progression but for some reason with CCSVI our expectations are much higher and we want to see improvements as well as stopping of progression!!

The fact that it does say that the PPMS and SPMS went back to baseline and did not worsen after 18 months maybe does mean there was no progression which is a positive in itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zamboni research: genetic difference in PPMS compared to RR

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

Cece

21

1435

Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:53 pm

Bethr View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Interviews with ISNVD participants are online---

cheerleader

11

625

Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:11 am

MrSuccess View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CCSVI in PPMS

Anna2

2

1282

Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:14 am

mrhodes40 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. PPMS and CCSVI

foreignlesion

12

2369

Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:21 pm

livabird View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. WHAT EVIDENCE THAT CCSVI WORKS FOR PPMS????

gallery23

2

282

Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:11 pm

Cece View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: