reg613 wrote:CureIous wrote:jenf wrote:Hi everyone,
I've been racking my brain trying to fit together the CCSVI pieces as it relates to MS, and my MS more specifically. Yesterday morning, I had an epiphany. My MS presented itself this past January, after a vigorous aerobics routine, followed by a neck injury. Three days later, my double vision started. I was convinced the double vision was as a result of the neck injury, also because I knew nothing of MS at the time. After months of symptoms and several hospital stays, I was finally diagnosed. Funny thing was, I didn't fall into some of the "typical' onset categories. I've never had Epstein Barr; I hadn't been under any stress; there was no virus prior to my symptoms; no family members have MS; the list goes on and on. The ONLY thing was my neck injury. Ironically, the left side of my neck still bothers me. I realize this may be grasping, but I can't help but think it's connected somehow.
As this research moves forward, I wonder if the connection to the dots will become clearer? I am convinced CCSVI is the answer, primarily because it FITS. Interesting stuff...
Hi Jen, I joined the site because of your post.
Your observations are very interesting. I've been hoping someone would weigh in with the neck injury issue.
My belief is that babies have their necks injured in bad birth. My son had a forceps delivery and all sorts of horrible unnatural intervention. I am writing a website about his case. He was like you... very observant and intuitive. Never believed the quacks!
I think your situation brings up the most compelling clue so far. Can you offer any more on it?
Somewhere on this site someone mentioned that embryologists were giving their two cents worth on the topic. This I fear could be a red herring. The medical profession (for what it is) is terrified birth issues are going to be looked at. However, these injuries are not happening in the womb but during birth because of liver (iron) disrupting drugs like demerol and the yanking and twisting of forceps. Not to mention cutting the cord when all the blood is in it (stem cells) and not the baby.
Natural childbirth would cut down on lots of stem cells so they don't want to interfere with the interventionist birthing style going on now.
I think there are those who know exactly what's what. MS is a created mystery, I bet you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users