mrhodes40 wrote:I believe they are the same group.
Sometimes when something is published they ask you to change things at the peer review. One example was that in Dr Simka's small study he had 3 probable MS persons who had reflux, but he was asked to eliminate that group from the final paper due to lack of diagnostic consistency for them--
Allow me to dive in and insert a q without making new topic (and I don't know if same group, always assumed it was except for what Marie just pointed out), that being are the 100 allowed to speak freely now? Seems we would have been catching some waves from them already since the paper is out. Seems awful quiet without them... I know we have at least 1 on here right but what about the rest!?
Kinda ties in with the topic so hopefully the cops wont get me for thread hijacking
RRMS Dx'd 2007, first episode 2004. Bilateral stent placement, 3 on left, 1 stent on right, at Stanford August 2009. Watch my operation video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwc6QlLVtko
, Virtually symptom free since, no relap