This Is MS Multiple Sclerosis Community: Knowledge & Support

Welcome to the world's leading forum on Multiple Sclerosis research, support, and knowledge. For over 10 years, This is MS has provided an unbiased community dedicated to Multiple Sclerosis patients, caregivers, and affected loved ones.
It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 10:21 pm


All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 5:47 am 
Offline
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 2
I remember when Tysabri first came on the market a number of years ago for the "first" time.

Since I’m basing this assumption on my MSy memory, it may not be 100 % accurate. Please correct me if I’m wrong (unless it’s my wife or my mother-in-law reading this post.....the only two people from whom i will not tolerate being corrected....you do realise I’m joking...right ? :D )

It seems to me that the results (of the Tysabri study) were so conclusive and that so many people were helped, that the FDA in the States, and other Health Boards from various counties, fast-tracked its application so that people could benefit from this treatment....then people started to die....they removed it. They brought it back as a mono-therapy, and fast-tracked it again.

If this is true, why can`t they fast-track diagnosis and treatment of CCSVI ?

Am I correct in being "suspicious" of decisions made by health authorities ?

Thanks ! Comments, corrections, misinterpretations (on my part) can be submitted, and are more than welcome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:07 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 154
If Zamboni's findings are replicated I suppose that the treatment has still to be approved by the FDA and other regulatory bodies. But I don't think that it will require fast tracking since angioplasty isn't an unkown.

_________________
Apologies for my terrible username. I never thought I'd use the forum much when I registered..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:02 am 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 860
Location: India
Tsyabri was probably different on 2 counts:
1) No one (I mean doctor) was losing his territory due to it
2) It was one pharma against another (tsyarbi vs other drugs)

Things have changed in case of CCSVI. Unfortunately for people like us, Neuros are generally the most decorated among dr community and are very slick. Combine this with the money power of drug companies.

Now who is left out,
1) the ms societies: I think already a lot has been said about them.
Some were sleeping and some pretending
2) policy makers: the least said about them the better it is, not to mention the fact they might even have a biased doctor as their core consultant team


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:20 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:00 pm
Posts: 214
once the buffalo studies come out independent verification is done I think you'll see more IRs be willing to diagnose and treat CCSVI....apart from MS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:10 pm 
Offline
Getting to Know You...
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 17
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Johnnymac wrote:
once the buffalo studies come out independent verification is done I think you'll see more IRs be willing to diagnose and treat CCSVI....apart from MS


Don't forget the Study being done in Vancouver, Canada at UBC, which replied to us saying they should be ready in approx. 4 mos for a full Case Study.

P.S. Johnny, like you signature.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:32 pm 
Offline
Family Elder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 332
Location: Rosetown, Canada
Also Saskatoon Saskatchewan is doing the study with UBC. funds could be directed there. Unlike Buffalo they will be sharing the information.

Saskatoon City Hospital Foundation
www.saskatooncityhospitalfoundation.com

The MRI Institute for Biomedical Research
www.ms-mri.com

Cameco MS Neuroscience Research Centre (site currently under construction)
www.usask.ca/healthsci/cmsnrc/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. My CCSVI Diagnosis and (hopeful) Treatment

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

EnjoyingTheRide

27

3901

Sun Mar 28, 2010 12:22 pm

hopeful2 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Why does treatment help so fast ?

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

bruce123

52

5757

Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:19 pm

jimmylegs View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CCSVI dead? Not so fast!

[ Go to pageGo to page: 1, 2 ]

dania

15

831

Fri May 10, 2013 3:52 pm

annad View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. CCSVI "CCSVI tracking project" french language !

Fred1208

2

1103

Thu May 06, 2010 7:27 am

Fred1208 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. American MS Society fast-tracks research on CCSVI

squiffy2

0

860

Wed May 05, 2010 4:36 am

squiffy2 View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: